mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AlgebraNets

arXiv 2006.07360 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural networks have historically been built layerwise from the set of functions in f: ℝn → ℝm , i.e. with activations and weights/parameters represented by real numbers, ℝ. Our work considers a richer set of objects for activations and weights, and undertakes a comprehensive study of alternative algebras as number representations by studying their performance on two challenging problems: large-scale image classification using the ImageNet dataset and language modeling using the enwiki8 and WikiText-103 datasets. We denote this broader class of models as AlgebraNets. Our findings indicate that the conclusions of prior work, which explored neural networks constructed from mathbbC (complex numbers) and mathbbH (quaternions) on smaller datasets, do not always transfer to these challenging settings. However, our results demonstrate that there are alternative algebras which deliver better parameter and computational efficiency compared with ℝ. We consider mathbbC, mathbbH, M2(ℝ) (the set of 2×2 real-valued matrices), M2(mathbbC), M3(ℝ) and M4(ℝ). Additionally, we note that multiplication in these algebras has higher compute density than real multiplication, a useful property in situations with inherently limited parameter reuse such as auto-regressive inference and sparse neural networks. We therefore investigate how to induce sparsity within AlgebraNets. We hope that our strong results on large-scale, practical benchmarks will spur further exploration of these unconventional architectures which challenge the default choice of using real numbers for neural network weights and activations.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

7 papers.