mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evading Curse of Dimensionality in Unconstrained Private GLMs via Private Gradient Descent

arXiv 2006.06783 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2020cs.CR cs.LG math.OCcited by 27

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We revisit the well-studied problem of differentially private empirical risk minimization (ERM). We show that for unconstrained convex generalized linear models (GLMs), one can obtain an excess empirical risk of tilde Oleft(√textttrank/ε nright), where textttrank is the rank of the feature matrix in the GLM problem, n is the number of data samples, and ε is the privacy parameter. This bound is attained via differentially private gradient descent (DP-GD). Furthermore, via the first lower bound for unconstrained private ERM, we show that our upper bound is tight. In sharp contrast to the constrained ERM setting, there is no dependence on the dimensionality of the ambient model space (p). (Notice that textttrank≤ minn, p.) Besides, we obtain an analogous excess population risk bound which depends on textttrank instead of p. For the smooth non-convex GLM setting (i.e., where the objective function is non-convex but preserves the GLM structure), we further show that DP-GD attains a dimension-independent convergence of tilde Oleft(√textttrank/ε nright) to a first-order-stationary-point of the underlying objective. Finally, we show that for convex GLMs, a variant of DP-GD commonly used in practice (which involves clipping the individual gradients) also exhibits the same dimension-independent convergence to the minimum of a well-defined objective. To that end, we provide a structural lemma that characterizes the effect of clipping on the optimization profile of DP-GD.

Key facts. Cited by 27 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 9; 2023: 7; 2024: 3; 2025: 3.

27 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Toward Training at ImageNet Scale with Differential Privacycited by 87
  2. 2021Understanding Clipping for Federated Learning: Convergence and Client-Level Differential Privacycited by 66
  3. 2022Exploring the Limits of Differentially Private Deep Learning with Group-wise Clippingcited by 52
  4. 2023(Amplified) Banded Matrix Factorization: A unified approach to private trainingcited by 49
  5. 2022When Does Differentially Private Learning Not Suffer in High Dimensions?cited by 48
  6. 2021High Dimensional Differentially Private Stochastic Optimization with Heavy-tailed Datacited by 42
  7. 2021Dynamic Differential-Privacy Preserving SGDcited by 29
  8. 2022Differentially Private Generalized Linear Models Revisitedcited by 17
  9. 2023Faster Differentially Private Convex Optimization via Second-Order Methodscited by 13
  10. 2023Differentially Private SGD Without Clipping Bias: An Error-Feedback Approachcited by 13
  11. 2021Faster Rates of Private Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 12
  12. 2024Private Gradient Descent for Linear Regression: Tighter Error Bounds and Instance-Specific Uncertainty Estimationcited by 11
15 more
  1. 2023PILLAR: How to make semi-private learning more effectivecited by 10
  2. 2023Near Optimal Private and Robust Linear Regressioncited by 9
  3. 2022Differentially Private ℓ1-norm Linear Regression with Heavy-tailed Datacited by 8
  4. 2022Differentially Private Image Classification from Featurescited by 7
  5. 2022(Nearly) Optimal Private Linear Regression via Adaptive Clippingcited by 6
  6. 2025DC-SGD: Differentially Private SGD with Dynamic Clipping through Gradient Norm Distribution Estimationcited by 6
  7. 2022Differentially Private Deep Learning with ModelMixcited by 4
  8. 2022Differentially Private Sampling from Rashomon Sets, and the Universality of Langevin Diffusion for Convex Optimizationcited by 3
  9. 2024Personalized Differential Privacy for Ridge Regressioncited by 3
  10. 2025Nearly Optimal Differentially Private ReLU Regressioncited by 3
  11. 2021High-Dimensional Differentially-Private EM Algorithm: Methods and Near-Optimal Statistical Guaranteescited by 2
  12. 2023The importance of feature preprocessing for differentially private linear optimizationcited by 2
  13. 2025Understanding Private Learning From Feature Perspectivecited by 2
  14. 2023Bias-Aware Minimisation: Understanding and Mitigating Estimator Bias in Private SGDcited by 1
  15. 2024Optimal Rates for O(1)-Smooth DP-SCO with a Single Epoch and Large Batchescited by 1