mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Leap-Of-Thought: Teaching Pre-Trained Models to Systematically Reason Over Implicit Knowledge

arXiv 2006.06609 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2020cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To what extent can a neural network systematically reason over symbolic facts? Evidence suggests that large pre-trained language models (LMs) acquire some reasoning capacity, but this ability is difficult to control. Recently, it has been shown that Transformer-based models succeed in consistent reasoning over explicit symbolic facts, under a "closed-world" assumption. However, in an open-domain setup, it is desirable to tap into the vast reservoir of implicit knowledge already encoded in the parameters of pre-trained LMs. In this work, we provide a first demonstration that LMs can be trained to reliably perform systematic reasoning combining both implicit, pre-trained knowledge and explicit natural language statements. To do this, we describe a procedure for automatically generating datasets that teach a model new reasoning skills, and demonstrate that models learn to effectively perform inference which involves implicit taxonomic and world knowledge, chaining and counting. Finally, we show that "teaching" models to reason generalizes beyond the training distribution: they successfully compose the usage of multiple reasoning skills in single examples. Our work paves a path towards open-domain systems that constantly improve by interacting with users who can instantly correct a model by adding simple natural language statements.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 12; 2022: 9; 2023: 3.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022CommonsenseQA 2.0: Exposing the Limits of AI through Gamificationcited by 108
  2. 2022When to Make Exceptions: Exploring Language Models as Accounts of Human Moral Judgmentcited by 93
  3. 2021When Can Models Learn From Explanations? A Formal Framework for Understanding the Roles of Explanation Datacited by 75
  4. 2023Bridging the Gap: A Survey on Integrating (Human) Feedback for Natural Language Generationcited by 55
  5. 2022Datasheet for the Pilecited by 41
  6. 2022Towards Teachable Reasoning Systems: Using a Dynamic Memory of User Feedback for Continual System Improvementcited by 37
  7. 2021Learning to Repair: Repairing model output errors after deployment using a dynamic memory of feedbackcited by 35
  8. 2022Chain of Thought Imitation with Procedure Cloningcited by 30
  9. 2021RuleBert: Teaching Soft Rules to Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 25
  10. 2021GNN is a Counter? Revisiting GNN for Question Answeringcited by 21
  11. 2022METGEN: A Module-Based Entailment Tree Generation Framework for Answer Explanationcited by 17
  12. 2021KI-BERT: Infusing Knowledge Context for Better Language and Domain Understandingcited by 11
12 more
  1. 2021Interscript: A dataset for interactive learning of scripts through error feedbackcited by 9
  2. 2021Does Pre-training Induce Systematic Inference? How Masked Language Models Acquire Commonsense Knowledgecited by 8
  3. 2022Can Transformers Reason in Fragments of Natural Language?cited by 8
  4. 2021Improving Neural Model Performance through Natural Language Feedback on Their Explanationscited by 5
  5. 2022Logical Reasoning for Task Oriented Dialogue Systemscited by 5
  6. 2023Decker: Double Check with Heterogeneous Knowledge for Commonsense Fact Verificationcited by 4
  7. 2021Updater-Extractor Architecture for Inductive World State Representationscited by 3
  8. 2021On Semantic Cognition, Inductive Generalization, and Language Modelscited by 2
  9. 2022Logically Consistent Adversarial Attacks for Soft Theorem Proverscited by 2
  10. 2023Using Language Models For Knowledge Acquisition in Natural Language Reasoning Problemscited by 2
  11. 2021Overcoming Poor Word Embeddings with Word Definitionscited by 1
  12. 2021Concepts, Properties and an Approach for Compositional Generalizationcited by 0