mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Performance in the Courtroom: Automated Processing and Visualization of Appeal Court Decisions in France

arXiv 2006.06251 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2020cs.CL cs.AI cs.IRcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial Intelligence techniques are already popular and important in the legal domain. We extract legal indicators from judicial judgment to decrease the asymmetry of information of the legal system and the access-to-justice gap. We use NLP methods to extract interesting entities/data from judgments to construct networks of lawyers and judgments. We propose metrics to rank lawyers based on their experience, wins/loss ratio and their importance in the network of lawyers. We also perform community detection in the network of judgments and propose metrics to represent the difficulty of cases capitalising on communities features.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

6 papers.