mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CLEval: Character-Level Evaluation for Text Detection and Recognition Tasks

arXiv 2006.06244 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2020cs.CVcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite the recent success of text detection and recognition methods, existing evaluation metrics fail to provide a fair and reliable comparison among those methods. In addition, there exists no end-to-end evaluation metric that takes characteristics of OCR tasks into account. Previous end-to-end metric contains cascaded errors from the binary scoring process applied in both detection and recognition tasks. Ignoring partially correct results raises a gap between quantitative and qualitative analysis, and prevents fine-grained assessment. Based on the fact that character is a key element of text, we hereby propose a Character-Level Evaluation metric (CLEval). In CLEval, the textitinstance matching process handles split and merge detection cases, and the textitscoring process conducts character-level evaluation. By aggregating character-level scores, the CLEval metric provides a fine-grained evaluation of end-to-end results composed of the detection and recognition as well as individual evaluations for each module from the end-performance perspective. We believe that our metrics can play a key role in developing and analyzing state-of-the-art text detection and recognition methods. The evaluation code is publicly available at https://github.com/clovaai/CLEval.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.

10 papers.