Adversarial Infidelity Learning for Model Interpretation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Model interpretation is essential in data mining and knowledge discovery. It can help understand the intrinsic model working mechanism and check if the model has undesired characteristics. A popular way of performing model interpretation is Instance-wise Feature Selection (IFS), which provides an importance score of each feature representing the data samples to explain how the model generates the specific output. In this paper, we propose a Model-agnostic Effective Efficient Direct (MEED) IFS framework for model interpretation, mitigating concerns about sanity, combinatorial shortcuts, model identifiability, and information transmission. Also, we focus on the following setting: using selected features to directly predict the output of the given model, which serves as a primary evaluation metric for model-interpretation methods. Apart from the features, we involve the output of the given model as an additional input to learn an explainer based on more accurate information. To learn the explainer, besides fidelity, we propose an Adversarial Infidelity Learning (AIL) mechanism to boost the explanation learning by screening relatively unimportant features. Through theoretical and experimental analysis, we show that our AIL mechanism can help learn the desired conditional distribution between selected features and targets. Moreover, we extend our framework by integrating efficient interpretation methods as proper priors to provide a warm start. Comprehensive empirical evaluation results are provided by quantitative metrics and human evaluation to demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of our proposed method. Our code is publicly available online at https://github.com/langlrsw/MEED.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 3.
9 papers.
- 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 299
- 2022Reinforced Causal Explainer for Graph Neural Networkscited by 34
- 2023Contrastive Video Question Answering via Video Graph Transformercited by 32
- 2023DEGREE: Decomposition Based Explanation For Graph Neural Networkscited by 18
- 2022Self-explaining deep models with logic rule reasoningcited by 13
- 2021Machine Learning for Multimodal Electronic Health Records-based Research: Challenges and Perspectivescited by 7
- 2023On Pitfalls of textitRemOve-And-Retrain: Data Processing Inequality Perspectivecited by 2
- 2021Towards interpreting ML-based automated malware detection models: a surveycited by 1
- 2022Towards Explanation for Unsupervised Graph-Level Representation Learningcited by 1
- 2023DEGREE: Decomposition Based Explanation For Graph Neural Networks22 May 2023
- 2023On Pitfalls of textitRemOve-And-Retrain: Data Processing Inequality Perspective26 Apr 2023
- 2023Contrastive Video Question Answering via Video Graph Transformer27 Feb 2023
- 2022Self-explaining deep models with logic rule reasoning13 Oct 2022
- 2022Towards Explanation for Unsupervised Graph-Level Representation Learning20 May 2022
- 2022Reinforced Causal Explainer for Graph Neural Networks23 Apr 2022
- 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AI20 Jan 2022
- 2021Machine Learning for Multimodal Electronic Health Records-based Research: Challenges and Perspectives9 Nov 2021
- 2021Towards interpreting ML-based automated malware detection models: a survey15 Jan 2021