Picket: Guarding Against Corrupted Data in Tabular Data during Learning and Inference
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data corruption is an impediment to modern machine learning deployments. Corrupted data can severely bias the learned model and can also lead to invalid inferences. We present, Picket, a simple framework to safeguard against data corruptions during both training and deployment of machine learning models over tabular data. For the training stage, Picket identifies and removes corrupted data points from the training data to avoid obtaining a biased model. For the deployment stage, Picket flags, in an online manner, corrupted query points to a trained machine learning model that due to noise will result in incorrect predictions. To detect corrupted data, Picket uses a self-supervised deep learning model for mixed-type tabular data, which we call PicketNet. To minimize the burden of deployment, learning a PicketNet model does not require any human-labeled data. Picket is designed as a plugin that can increase the robustness of any machine learning pipeline. We evaluate Picket on a diverse array of real-world data considering different corruption models that include systematic and adversarial noise during both training and testing. We show that Picket consistently safeguards against corrupted data during both training and deployment of various models ranging from SVMs to neural networks, beating a diverse array of competing methods that span from data quality validation models to robust outlier-detection models.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.
11 papers.
- 2023REIN: A Comprehensive Benchmark Framework for Data Cleaning Methods in ML Pipelinescited by 10
- 2023Data Cleaning and Machine Learning: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 9
- 2022Quality issues in Machine Learning Software Systemscited by 7
- 2024Falcon: Fair Active Learning using Multi-armed Banditscited by 6
- 2023BClean: A Bayesian Data Cleaning Systemcited by 2
- 2022Repairing Systematic Outliers by Learning Clean Subspaces in VAEscited by 1
- 2024Foundation Model Engineering: Engineering Foundation Models Just as Engineering Softwarecited by 1
- 2025Quality Assessment of Tabular Data using Large Language Models and Code Generationcited by 1
- 2023Quality Issues in Machine Learning Software Systemscited by 0
- 2024Table2Image: Lightweight Tabular Learning with Generated Proxy Representations and Reliability Diagnosticscited by 0
- 2024Backdoor attacks on DNN and GBDT -- A Case Study from the insurance domaincited by 0
- 2025Quality Assessment of Tabular Data using Large Language Models and Code Generation11 Sep 2025
- 2024Backdoor attacks on DNN and GBDT -- A Case Study from the insurance domain11 Dec 2024
- 2024Table2Image: Lightweight Tabular Learning with Generated Proxy Representations and Reliability Diagnostics9 Dec 2024
- 2024Foundation Model Engineering: Engineering Foundation Models Just as Engineering Software11 Jul 2024
- 2024Falcon: Fair Active Learning using Multi-armed Bandits23 Jan 2024
- 2023BClean: A Bayesian Data Cleaning System11 Nov 2023
- 2023Data Cleaning and Machine Learning: A Systematic Literature Review3 Oct 2023
- 2023Quality Issues in Machine Learning Software Systems26 Jun 2023
- 2023REIN: A Comprehensive Benchmark Framework for Data Cleaning Methods in ML Pipelines9 Feb 2023
- 2022Quality issues in Machine Learning Software Systems18 Aug 2022
- 2022Repairing Systematic Outliers by Learning Clean Subspaces in VAEs17 Jul 2022