Sparse learning with CART
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Decision trees with binary splits are popularly constructed using Classification and Regression Trees (CART) methodology. For regression models, this approach recursively divides the data into two near-homogenous daughter nodes according to a split point that maximizes the reduction in sum of squares error (the impurity) along a particular variable. This paper aims to study the statistical properties of regression trees constructed with CART methodology. In doing so, we find that the training error is governed by the Pearson correlation between the optimal decision stump and response data in each node, which we bound by constructing a prior distribution on the split points and solving a nonlinear optimization problem. We leverage this connection between the training error and Pearson correlation to show that CART with cost-complexity pruning achieves an optimal complexity/goodness-of-fit tradeoff when the depth scales with the logarithm of the sample size. Data dependent quantities, which adapt to the dimensionality and latent structure of the regression model, are seen to govern the rates of convergence of the prediction error.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2021Large Scale Prediction with Decision Treescited by 28
- 2023Synthetic Combinations: A Causal Inference Framework for Combinatorial Interventionscited by 12
- 2021A cautionary tale on fitting decision trees to data from additive models: generalization lower boundscited by 9
- 2021Muddling Label Regularization: Deep Learning for Tabular Datasetscited by 5
- 2021Consistent Sufficient Explanations and Minimal Local Rules for explaining regression and classification modelscited by 4
- 2023Optimal Sparse Recovery with Decision Stumpscited by 2
- 2022AdaCap: Adaptive Capacity control for Feed-Forward Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2024Building Trees for Probabilistic Prediction via Scoring Rulescited by 0
- 2024Grafting: Making Random Forests Consistentcited by 0
- 2025Revisiting Randomization in Greedy Model Searchcited by 0
- 2025Empowering Decision Trees via Shape Function Branchingcited by 0
- 2026Covariance-Driven Regression Trees: Reducing Overfitting in CARTcited by 0
- 2026Covariance-Driven Regression Trees: Reducing Overfitting in CART12 Jan 2026
- 2025Empowering Decision Trees via Shape Function Branching21 Oct 2025
- 2025Revisiting Randomization in Greedy Model Search18 Jun 2025
- 2024Grafting: Making Random Forests Consistent9 Mar 2024
- 2024Building Trees for Probabilistic Prediction via Scoring Rules16 Feb 2024
- 2023Synthetic Combinations: A Causal Inference Framework for Combinatorial Interventions24 Mar 2023
- 2023Optimal Sparse Recovery with Decision Stumps8 Mar 2023
- 2022AdaCap: Adaptive Capacity control for Feed-Forward Neural Networks9 May 2022
- 2021Consistent Sufficient Explanations and Minimal Local Rules for explaining regression and classification models8 Nov 2021
- 2021A cautionary tale on fitting decision trees to data from additive models: generalization lower bounds18 Oct 2021
- 2021Muddling Label Regularization: Deep Learning for Tabular Datasets8 Jun 2021
- 2021Large Scale Prediction with Decision Trees28 Apr 2021