Constant-Expansion Suffices for Compressed Sensing with Generative Priors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative neural networks have been empirically found very promising in providing effective structural priors for compressed sensing, since they can be trained to span low-dimensional data manifolds in high-dimensional signal spaces. Despite the non-convexity of the resulting optimization problem, it has also been shown theoretically that, for neural networks with random Gaussian weights, a signal in the range of the network can be efficiently, approximately recovered from a few noisy measurements. However, a major bottleneck of these theoretical guarantees is a network expansivity condition: that each layer of the neural network must be larger than the previous by a logarithmic factor. Our main contribution is to break this strong expansivity assumption, showing that constant expansivity suffices to get efficient recovery algorithms, besides it also being information-theoretically necessary. To overcome the theoretical bottleneck in existing approaches we prove a novel uniform concentration theorem for random functions that might not be Lipschitz but satisfy a relaxed notion which we call "pseudo-Lipschitzness." Using this theorem we can show that a matrix concentration inequality known as the Weight Distribution Condition (WDC), which was previously only known to hold for Gaussian matrices with logarithmic aspect ratio, in fact holds for constant aspect ratios too. Since the WDC is a fundamental matrix concentration inequality in the heart of all existing theoretical guarantees on this problem, our tighter bound immediately yields improvements in all known results in the literature on compressed sensing with deep generative priors, including one-bit recovery, phase retrieval, low-rank matrix recovery, and more.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2021Regularising Inverse Problems with Generative Machine Learning Modelscited by 22
- 2022Theoretical Perspectives on Deep Learning Methods in Inverse Problemscited by 22
- 2022Score-Guided Intermediate Layer Optimization: Fast Langevin Mixing for Inverse Problemscited by 11
- 2024Injectivity capacity of ReLU gatescited by 4
- 2022Signal Recovery with Non-Expansive Generative Network Priorscited by 1
- 2025Phase transition of descending phase retrieval algorithmscited by 0
- 2025Optimal spectral initializers impact on phase retrieval phase transitions -- an RDT viewcited by 0
- 2025Phase retrieval with rank d measurements -- descending algorithms phase transitionscited by 0
- 2026Measurement Geometry and Design for Trustworthy Generative Inverse Problemscited by 0
- 2026Measurement Geometry and Design for Trustworthy Generative Inverse Problems1 Jun 2026
- 2025Phase retrieval with rank d measurements -- descending algorithms phase transitions23 Jun 2025
- 2025Optimal spectral initializers impact on phase retrieval phase transitions -- an RDT view23 Jun 2025
- 2025Phase transition of descending phase retrieval algorithms23 Jun 2025
- 2024Injectivity capacity of ReLU gates28 Oct 2024
- 2022Theoretical Perspectives on Deep Learning Methods in Inverse Problems29 Jun 2022
- 2022Score-Guided Intermediate Layer Optimization: Fast Langevin Mixing for Inverse Problems18 Jun 2022
- 2022Signal Recovery with Non-Expansive Generative Network Priors24 Apr 2022
- 2021Regularising Inverse Problems with Generative Machine Learning Models22 Jul 2021