mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep learning-based reduced order models in cardiac electrophysiology

arXiv 2006.03040 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2020physics.comp-ph cs.LG cs.NAcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Predicting the electrical behavior of the heart, from the cellular scale to the tissue level, relies on the formulation and numerical approximation of coupled nonlinear dynamical systems. These systems describe the cardiac action potential, that is the polarization/depolarization cycle occurring at every heart beat that models the time evolution of the electrical potential across the cell membrane, as well as a set of ionic variables. Multiple solutions of these systems, corresponding to different model inputs, are required to evaluate outputs of clinical interest, such as activation maps and action potential duration. More importantly, these models feature coherent structures that propagate over time, such as wavefronts. These systems can hardly be reduced to lower dimensional problems by conventional reduced order models (ROMs) such as, e.g., the reduced basis (RB) method. This is primarily due to the low regularity of the solution manifold (with respect to the problem parameters) as well as to the nonlinear nature of the input-output maps that we intend to reconstruct numerically. To overcome this difficulty, in this paper we propose a new, nonlinear approach which exploits deep learning (DL) algorithms to obtain accurate and efficient ROMs, whose dimensionality matches the number of system parameters. Our DL approach combines deep feedforward neural networks (NNs) and convolutional autoencoders (AEs). We show that the proposed DL-ROM framework can efficiently provide solutions to parametrized electrophysiology problems, thus enabling multi-scenario analysis in pathological cases. We investigate three challenging test cases in cardiac electrophysiology and prove that DL-ROM outperforms classical projection-based ROMs.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 10; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

22 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021POD-DL-ROM: enhancing deep learning-based reduced order models for nonlinear parametrized PDEs by proper orthogonal decompositioncited by 79
  2. 2022Continuous PDE Dynamics Forecasting with Implicit Neural Representationscited by 71
  3. 2022Generalizing to New Physical Systems via Context-Informed Dynamics Modelcited by 49
  4. 2021LEADS: Learning Dynamical Systems that Generalize Across Environmentscited by 39
  5. 2022Deep Learning Methods for Partial Differential Equations and Related Parameter Identification Problemscited by 34
  6. 2023Deep Learning in Deterministic Computational Mechanicscited by 21
  7. 2022Multi-fidelity surrogate modeling using long short-term memory networkscited by 18
  8. 2021Real-time simulation of parameter-dependent fluid flows through deep learning-based reduced order modelscited by 12
  9. 2022Long-time prediction of nonlinear parametrized dynamical systems by deep learning-based reduced order modelscited by 10
  10. 2022Deep-HyROMnet: A deep learning-based operator approximation for hyper-reduction of nonlinear parametrized PDEscited by 7
  11. 2022Continual Learning of Dynamical Systems with Competitive Federated Reservoir Computingcited by 6
  12. 2024VC dimension of Graph Neural Networks with Pfaffian activation functionscited by 6
10 more
  1. 2022Phase2vec: Dynamical systems embedding with a physics-informed convolutional networkcited by 5
  2. 2021Fast characterization of inducible regions of atrial fibrillation models with multi-fidelity Gaussian process classificationcited by 3
  3. 2022An AI-based Domain-Decomposition Non-Intrusive Reduced-Order Model for Extended Domains applied to Multiphase Flow in Pipescited by 3
  4. 2023Branched Latent Neural Mapscited by 3
  5. 2024Learning Macroscopic Dynamics from Partial Microscopic Observationscited by 3
  6. 2025Full-field surrogate modeling of cardiac function encoding geometric variabilitycited by 3
  7. 2026Fluids You Can Trust: Property-Preserving Operator Learning for Incompressible Flowscited by 2
  8. 2022Virtual twins of nonlinear vibrating multiphysics microstructures: physics-based versus deep learning-based approachescited by 1
  9. 2025Learning cardiac activation and repolarization times with operator learningcited by 1
  10. 2026Parameterized Temporal Extrapolation of PDEs via Disentangled Latent Dynamics Manifold Fusioncited by 0