mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neural Networks with Small Weights and Depth-Separation Barriers

arXiv 2006.00625 ↗First posted 31 May 2020cs.LG cs.CC stat.MLcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In studying the expressiveness of neural networks, an important question is whether there are functions which can only be approximated by sufficiently deep networks, assuming their size is bounded. However, for constant depths, existing results are limited to depths 2 and 3, and achieving results for higher depths has been an important open question. In this paper, we focus on feedforward ReLU networks, and prove fundamental barriers to proving such results beyond depth 4, by reduction to open problems and natural-proof barriers in circuit complexity. To show this, we study a seemingly unrelated problem of independent interest: Namely, whether there are polynomially-bounded functions which require super-polynomial weights in order to approximate with constant-depth neural networks. We provide a negative and constructive answer to that question, by showing that if a function can be approximated by a polynomially-sized, constant depth k network with arbitrarily large weights, it can also be approximated by a polynomially-sized, depth 3k+3 network, whose weights are polynomially bounded.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 May 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

17 papers.

Sort: