mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Prevalence Threshold and the Geometry of Screening Curves

arXiv 2006.00398 ↗First posted 31 May 2020stat.MEcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The relationship between a screening tests' positive predictive value, ρ, and its target prevalence, φ, is proportional - though not linear in all but a special case. In consequence, there is a point of local extrema of curvature defined only as a function of the sensitivity a and specificity b beyond which the rate of change of a test's ρ drops precipitously relative to φ. Herein, we show the mathematical model exploring this phenomenon and define the prevalence threshold (φe) point where this change occurs as: φe=frac√aleft(-b+1right)+b-1(varepsilon-1) where varepsilon = a+b. Using its radical conjugate, we obtain a simplified version of the equation: frac√1-b√a+√1-b. From the prevalence threshold we deduce a more generalized relationship between prevalence and positive predictive value as a function of varepsilon, which represents a fundamental theorem of screening, herein defined as: displaystylelimvarepsilon → 2displaystyle int01ρ(φ)dφ = 1 Understanding the concepts described in this work can help contextualize the validity of screening tests in real time, and help guide the interpretation of different clinical scenarios in which screening is undertaken.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 May 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.

7 papers.