An Efficient Planar Bundle Adjustment Algorithm
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper presents an efficient algorithm for the least-squares problem using the point-to-plane cost, which aims to jointly optimize depth sensor poses and plane parameters for 3D reconstruction. We call this least-squares problem Planar Bundle Adjustment (PBA), due to the similarity between this problem and the original Bundle Adjustment (BA) in visual reconstruction. As planes ubiquitously exist in the man-made environment, they are generally used as landmarks in SLAM algorithms for various depth sensors. PBA is important to reduce drift and improve the quality of the map. However, directly adopting the well-established BA framework in visual reconstruction will result in a very inefficient solution for PBA. This is because a 3D point only has one observation at a camera pose. In contrast, a depth sensor can record hundreds of points in a plane at a time, which results in a very large nonlinear least-squares problem even for a small-scale space. Fortunately, we find that there exist a special structure of the PBA problem. We introduce a reduced Jacobian matrix and a reduced residual vector, and prove that they can replace the original Jacobian matrix and residual vector in the generally adopted Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) algorithm. This significantly reduces the computational cost. Besides, when planes are combined with other features for 3D reconstruction, the reduced Jacobian matrix and residual vector can also replace the corresponding parts derived from planes. Our experimental results verify that our algorithm can significantly reduce the computational time compared to the solution using the traditional BA framework. Besides, our algorithm is faster, more accuracy, and more robust to initialization errors compared to the start-of-the-art solution using the plane-to-plane cost
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 4.
10 papers.
- 2024GlobalPointer: Large-Scale Plane Adjustment with Bi-Convex Relaxationcited by 11
- 2022VIP-SLAM: An Efficient Tightly-Coupled RGB-D Visual Inertial Planar SLAMcited by 7
- 2021Incremental Abstraction in Distributed Probabilistic SLAM Graphscited by 3
- 2022Efficient Second-Order Plane Adjustmentcited by 3
- 2022CNN-Augmented Visual-Inertial SLAM with Planar Constraintscited by 0
- 2022LMBAO: A Landmark Map for Bundle Adjustment Odometry in LiDAR SLAMcited by 0
- 2023An Efficient Plane Extraction Approach for Bundle Adjustment on LiDAR Point cloudscited by 0
- 2024Robust Second-order LiDAR Bundle Adjustment Algorithm Using Mean Squared Group Metriccited by 0
- 2024Micro-Structures Graph-Based Point Cloud Registration for Balancing Efficiency and Accuracycited by 0
- 2024A novel algorithm for optimizing bundle adjustment in image sequence alignmentcited by 0
- 2024A novel algorithm for optimizing bundle adjustment in image sequence alignment10 Nov 2024
- 2024Micro-Structures Graph-Based Point Cloud Registration for Balancing Efficiency and Accuracy29 Oct 2024
- 2024Robust Second-order LiDAR Bundle Adjustment Algorithm Using Mean Squared Group Metric3 Sep 2024
- 2024GlobalPointer: Large-Scale Plane Adjustment with Bi-Convex Relaxation18 Jul 2024
- 2023An Efficient Plane Extraction Approach for Bundle Adjustment on LiDAR Point clouds29 Apr 2023
- 2022Efficient Second-Order Plane Adjustment21 Nov 2022
- 2022LMBAO: A Landmark Map for Bundle Adjustment Odometry in LiDAR SLAM19 Sep 2022
- 2022VIP-SLAM: An Efficient Tightly-Coupled RGB-D Visual Inertial Planar SLAM4 Jul 2022
- 2022CNN-Augmented Visual-Inertial SLAM with Planar Constraints5 May 2022
- 2021Incremental Abstraction in Distributed Probabilistic SLAM Graphs13 Sep 2021