Fair Policy Targeting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
One of the major concerns of targeting interventions on individuals in social welfare programs is discrimination: individualized treatments may induce disparities across sensitive attributes such as age, gender, or race. This paper addresses the question of the design of fair and efficient treatment allocation rules. We adopt the non-maleficence perspective of first do no harm: we select the fairest allocation within the Pareto frontier. We cast the optimization into a mixed-integer linear program formulation, which can be solved using off-the-shelf algorithms. We derive regret bounds on the unfairness of the estimated policy function and small sample guarantees on the Pareto frontier under general notions of fairness. Finally, we illustrate our method using an application from education economics.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
12 papers.
- 2021Learning to be Fair: A Consequentialist Approach to Equitable Decision-Makingcited by 11
- 2023Fair Off-Policy Learning from Observational Datacited by 11
- 2022When Personalization Harms: Reconsidering the Use of Group Attributes in Predictioncited by 6
- 2023Fair and Robust Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects for Policy Learningcited by 6
- 2023Participatory Personalization in Classificationcited by 5
- 2025Counterfactually Fair Reinforcement Learning via Sequential Data Preprocessingcited by 5
- 2023Econometrics of Machine Learning Methods in Economic Forecastingcited by 1
- 2024Towards Optimal Environmental Policies: Policy Learning under Arbitrary Bipartite Network Interferencecited by 0
- 2025Fairness-aware kidney exchange and kidney paired donationcited by 0
- 2025Optimal Transport Learning: Balancing Value Optimization and Fairness in Individualized Treatment Rulescited by 0
- 2026Dynamic Treatment on Networkscited by 0
- 2026Counterfactually Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Counterfactually Safe Reinforcement Learning24 May 2026
- 2026Dynamic Treatment on Networks7 May 2026
- 2025Optimal Transport Learning: Balancing Value Optimization and Fairness in Individualized Treatment Rules31 Jul 2025
- 2025Fairness-aware kidney exchange and kidney paired donation9 Mar 2025
- 2025Counterfactually Fair Reinforcement Learning via Sequential Data Preprocessing10 Jan 2025
- 2024Towards Optimal Environmental Policies: Policy Learning under Arbitrary Bipartite Network Interference10 Oct 2024
- 2023Econometrics of Machine Learning Methods in Economic Forecasting21 Aug 2023
- 2023Fair and Robust Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects for Policy Learning6 Jun 2023
- 2023Fair Off-Policy Learning from Observational Data15 Mar 2023
- 2023Participatory Personalization in Classification8 Feb 2023
- 2022When Personalization Harms: Reconsidering the Use of Group Attributes in Prediction4 Jun 2022
- 2021Learning to be Fair: A Consequentialist Approach to Equitable Decision-Making18 Sep 2021