Adversarial NLI for Factual Correctness in Text Summarisation Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We apply the Adversarial NLI dataset to train the NLI model and show that the model has the potential to enhance factual correctness in abstract summarization. We follow the work of Falke et al. (2019), which rank multiple generated summaries based on the entailment probabilities between an source document and summaries and select the summary that has the highest entailment probability. The authors' earlier study concluded that current NLI models are not sufficiently accurate for the ranking task. We show that the Transformer models fine-tuned on the new dataset achieve significantly higher accuracy and have the potential of selecting a coherent summary.
Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 5; 2024: 3.
13 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
- 2023RAGTruth: A Hallucination Corpus for Developing Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 272
- 2021QAFactEval: Improved QA-Based Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarizationcited by 233
- 2023A Critical Evaluation of Evaluations for Long-form Question Answeringcited by 111
- 2024Safeguarding Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 73
- 2022Faithfulness in Natural Language Generation: A Systematic Survey of Analysis, Evaluation and Optimization Methodscited by 27
- 2022Don't Say What You Don't Know: Improving the Consistency of Abstractive Summarization by Constraining Beam Searchcited by 23
- 2021Investigating Crowdsourcing Protocols for Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 15
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models for Health-related Queries with Presuppositionscited by 12
- 2023SWING: Balancing Coverage and Faithfulness for Dialogue Summarizationcited by 10
- 2024Using Similarity to Evaluate Factual Consistency in Summariescited by 5
- 2022Just ClozE! A Novel Framework for Evaluating the Factual Consistency Faster in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 0
- 2024Using Similarity to Evaluate Factual Consistency in Summaries23 Sep 2024
- 2024Safeguarding Large Language Models: A Survey3 Jun 2024
- 2024Improving Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summarization via Data Distillation and Conditional-generation Cloze13 Feb 2024
- 2023RAGTruth: A Hallucination Corpus for Developing Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Language Models31 Dec 2023
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models for Health-related Queries with Presuppositions14 Dec 2023
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions9 Nov 2023
- 2023A Critical Evaluation of Evaluations for Long-form Question Answering29 May 2023
- 2023SWING: Balancing Coverage and Faithfulness for Dialogue Summarization25 Jan 2023
- 2022Just ClozE! A Novel Framework for Evaluating the Factual Consistency Faster in Abstractive Summarization6 Oct 2022
- 2022Don't Say What You Don't Know: Improving the Consistency of Abstractive Summarization by Constraining Beam Search16 Mar 2022
- 2022Faithfulness in Natural Language Generation: A Systematic Survey of Analysis, Evaluation and Optimization Methods10 Mar 2022
- 2021QAFactEval: Improved QA-Based Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarization16 Dec 2021
- 2024Safeguarding Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 73
- 2024Safeguarding Large Language Models: A Survey3 Jun 2024
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
- 2021QAFactEval: Improved QA-Based Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarizationcited by 233
- 2023A Critical Evaluation of Evaluations for Long-form Question Answeringcited by 111
- 2022Faithfulness in Natural Language Generation: A Systematic Survey of Analysis, Evaluation and Optimization Methodscited by 27
- 2022Don't Say What You Don't Know: Improving the Consistency of Abstractive Summarization by Constraining Beam Searchcited by 23
- 2021Investigating Crowdsourcing Protocols for Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 15
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models for Health-related Queries with Presuppositionscited by 12
- 2023SWING: Balancing Coverage and Faithfulness for Dialogue Summarizationcited by 10
- 2024Using Similarity to Evaluate Factual Consistency in Summariescited by 5
- 2022Just ClozE! A Novel Framework for Evaluating the Factual Consistency Faster in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 0
- 2024Improving Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summarization via Data Distillation and Conditional-generation Clozecited by 0
- 2024Using Similarity to Evaluate Factual Consistency in Summaries23 Sep 2024
- 2024Improving Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summarization via Data Distillation and Conditional-generation Cloze13 Feb 2024
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models for Health-related Queries with Presuppositions14 Dec 2023
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions9 Nov 2023
- 2023A Critical Evaluation of Evaluations for Long-form Question Answering29 May 2023
- 2023SWING: Balancing Coverage and Faithfulness for Dialogue Summarization25 Jan 2023
- 2022Just ClozE! A Novel Framework for Evaluating the Factual Consistency Faster in Abstractive Summarization6 Oct 2022
- 2022Don't Say What You Don't Know: Improving the Consistency of Abstractive Summarization by Constraining Beam Search16 Mar 2022
- 2022Faithfulness in Natural Language Generation: A Systematic Survey of Analysis, Evaluation and Optimization Methods10 Mar 2022
- 2021QAFactEval: Improved QA-Based Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarization16 Dec 2021
- 2021Investigating Crowdsourcing Protocols for Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Summaries19 Sep 2021