mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Consistency of Empirical Bayes And Kernel Flow For Hierarchical Parameter Estimation

arXiv 2005.11375 ↗First posted 22 May 2020math.ST cs.NA math.NAcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Gaussian process regression has proven very powerful in statistics, machine learning and inverse problems. A crucial aspect of the success of this methodology, in a wide range of applications to complex and real-world problems, is hierarchical modeling and learning of hyperparameters. The purpose of this paper is to study two paradigms of learning hierarchical parameters: one is from the probabilistic Bayesian perspective, in particular, the empirical Bayes approach that has been largely used in Bayesian statistics; the other is from the deterministic and approximation theoretic view, and in particular the kernel flow algorithm that was proposed recently in the machine learning literature. Analysis of their consistency in the large data limit, as well as explicit identification of their implicit bias in parameter learning, are established in this paper for a Mat'ern-like model on the torus. A particular technical challenge we overcome is the learning of the regularity parameter in the Mat'ern-like field, for which consistency results have been very scarce in the spatial statistics literature. Moreover, we conduct extensive numerical experiments beyond the Mat'ern-like model, comparing the two algorithms further. These experiments demonstrate learning of other hierarchical parameters, such as amplitude and lengthscale; they also illustrate the setting of model misspecification in which the kernel flow approach could show superior performance to the more traditional empirical Bayes approach.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 May 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 6; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

18 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Solving and Learning Nonlinear PDEs with Gaussian Processescited by 129
  2. 2023Kernel Methods are Competitive for Operator Learningcited by 50
  3. 2023Sparse Cholesky Factorization for Solving Nonlinear PDEs via Gaussian Processescited by 31
  4. 2021Computational Graph Completioncited by 28
  5. 2023Error Analysis of Kernel/GP Methods for Nonlinear and Parametric PDEscited by 21
  6. 2023Sampling via Gradient Flows in the Space of Probability Measurescited by 20
  7. 2022Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Gaussian Process Regression is Ill-Posedcited by 16
  8. 2022One-Shot Learning of Stochastic Differential Equations with Data Adapted Kernelscited by 15
  9. 2021Learning dynamical systems from data: A simple cross-validation perspective, part III: Irregularly-Sampled Time Seriescited by 14
  10. 2022Nonparametric learning of kernels in nonlocal operatorscited by 10
  11. 2022Learning "best" kernels from data in Gaussian process regression. With application to aerodynamicscited by 9
  12. 2024Hyperparameter Optimization for Randomized Algorithms: A Case Study on Random Featurescited by 7
6 more
  1. 2022Gaussian Process Hydrodynamicscited by 4
  2. 2024Gaussian Measures Conditioned on Nonlinear Observations: Consistency, MAP Estimators, and Simulationcited by 4
  3. 2025Bilevel optimization for learning hyperparameters: Application to solving PDEs and inverse problems with Gaussian processescited by 3
  4. 2022Asymptotic Bounds for Smoothness Parameter Estimates in Gaussian Process Interpolationcited by 2
  5. 2025Solving Functional PDEs with Gaussian Processes and Applications to Functional Renormalization Group Equationscited by 0
  6. 2026On the Nonasymptotic Scaling Guarantee of Hyperparameter Estimation in Inhomogeneous, Weakly-Dependent Complex Network Dynamical Systemscited by 0