mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating Neural Morphological Taggers for Sanskrit

arXiv 2005.10893 ↗First posted 21 May 2020cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural sequence labelling approaches have achieved state of the art results in morphological tagging. We evaluate the efficacy of four standard sequence labelling models on Sanskrit, a morphologically rich, fusional Indian language. As its label space can theoretically contain more than 40,000 labels, systems that explicitly model the internal structure of a label are more suited for the task, because of their ability to generalise to labels not seen during training. We find that although some neural models perform better than others, one of the common causes for error for all of these models is mispredictions due to syncretism.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 May 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

7 papers.