Unsupervised anomaly localization using VAE and beta-VAE
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Variational Auto-Encoders (VAEs) have shown great potential in the unsupervised learning of data distributions. An VAE trained on normal images is expected to only be able to reconstruct normal images, allowing the localization of anomalous pixels in an image via manipulating information within the VAE ELBO loss. The ELBO consists of KL divergence loss (image-wise) and reconstruction loss (pixel-wise). It is natural and straightforward to use the later as the predictor. However, usually local anomaly added to a normal image can deteriorate the whole reconstructed image, causing segmentation using only naive pixel errors not accurate. Energy based projection was proposed to increase the reconstruction accuracy of normal regions/pixels, which achieved the state-of-the-art localization accuracy on simple natural images. Another possible predictors are ELBO and its components gradients with respect to each pixels. Previous work claimed that KL gradient is a robust predictor. In this paper, we argue that the energy based projection in medical imaging is not as useful as on natural images. Moreover, we observe that the robustness of KL gradient predictor totally depends on the setting of the VAE and dataset. We also explored the effect of the weight of KL loss within beta-VAE and predictor ensemble in anomaly localization.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
8 papers.
- 2022What is Healthy? Generative Counterfactual Diffusion for Lesion Localizationcited by 52
- 2023Unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms on real-world data: how many do we need?cited by 20
- 2021Efficient Out-of-Distribution Detection Using Latent Space of β-VAE for Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 19
- 2025Scalable, Explainable and Provably Robust Anomaly Detection with One-Step Flow Matchingcited by 8
- 2024Blind Localization and Clustering of Anomalies in Texturescited by 5
- 2023Confidence-Aware and Self-Supervised Image Anomaly Localisationcited by 4
- 2023Learning Cortical Anomaly through Masked Encoding for Unsupervised Heterogeneity Mappingcited by 1
- 2025Applying Deep Learning to Anomaly Detection of Russian Satellite Activity for Indications Prior to Military Activitycited by 0
- 2025Scalable, Explainable and Provably Robust Anomaly Detection with One-Step Flow Matching21 Oct 2025
- 2025Applying Deep Learning to Anomaly Detection of Russian Satellite Activity for Indications Prior to Military Activity24 Aug 2025
- 2024Blind Localization and Clustering of Anomalies in Textures18 Apr 2024
- 2023Learning Cortical Anomaly through Masked Encoding for Unsupervised Heterogeneity Mapping5 Dec 2023
- 2023Unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms on real-world data: how many do we need?1 May 2023
- 2023Confidence-Aware and Self-Supervised Image Anomaly Localisation23 Mar 2023
- 2022What is Healthy? Generative Counterfactual Diffusion for Lesion Localization25 Jul 2022
- 2021Efficient Out-of-Distribution Detection Using Latent Space of β-VAE for Cyber-Physical Systems26 Aug 2021