A Further Study of Unsupervised Pre-training for Transformer Based Speech Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Building a good speech recognition system usually requires large amounts of transcribed data, which is expensive to collect. To tackle this problem, many unsupervised pre-training methods have been proposed. Among these methods, Masked Predictive Coding achieved significant improvements on various speech recognition datasets with BERT-like Masked Reconstruction loss and Transformer backbone. However, many aspects of MPC have not been fully investigated. In this paper, we conduct a further study on MPC and focus on three important aspects: the effect of pre-training data speaking style, its extension on streaming model, and how to better transfer learned knowledge from pre-training stage to downstream tasks. Experiments reveled that pre-training data with matching speaking style is more useful on downstream recognition tasks. A unified training objective with APC and MPC provided 8.46% relative error reduction on streaming model trained on HKUST. Also, the combination of target data adaption and layer-wise discriminative training helped the knowledge transfer of MPC, which achieved 3.99% relative error reduction on AISHELL over a strong baseline.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
12 papers.
- 2022Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning: A Reviewcited by 258
- 2021BENDR: using transformers and a contrastive self-supervised learning task to learn from massive amounts of EEG datacited by 194
- 2021SpeechT5: Unified-Modal Encoder-Decoder Pre-Training for Spoken Language Processingcited by 177
- 2023Cross-Modal Fine-Tuning: Align then Refinecited by 34
- 2022SUPERB @ SLT 2022: Challenge on Generalization and Efficiency of Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learningcited by 26
- 2021Don't speak too fast: The impact of data bias on self-supervised speech modelscited by 20
- 2022A Brief Overview of Unsupervised Neural Speech Representation Learningcited by 9
- 2025NeurIPT: Foundation Model for Neural Interfacescited by 9
- 2021MEmoBERT: Pre-training Model with Prompt-based Learning for Multimodal Emotion Recognitioncited by 7
- 2021Decoupling recognition and transcription in Mandarin ASRcited by 6
- 2023On-Device Constrained Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning for Keyword Spotting via Knowledge Distillationcited by 2
- 2023A Quantitative Approach to Understand Self-Supervised Models as Cross-lingual Feature Extractorscited by 2
- 2025NeurIPT: Foundation Model for Neural Interfaces18 Oct 2025
- 2023A Quantitative Approach to Understand Self-Supervised Models as Cross-lingual Feature Extractors27 Nov 2023
- 2023On-Device Constrained Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning for Keyword Spotting via Knowledge Distillation6 Jul 2023
- 2023Cross-Modal Fine-Tuning: Align then Refine11 Feb 2023
- 2022SUPERB @ SLT 2022: Challenge on Generalization and Efficiency of Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning16 Oct 2022
- 2022Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning: A Review21 May 2022
- 2022A Brief Overview of Unsupervised Neural Speech Representation Learning1 Mar 2022
- 2021MEmoBERT: Pre-training Model with Prompt-based Learning for Multimodal Emotion Recognition27 Oct 2021
- 2021Don't speak too fast: The impact of data bias on self-supervised speech models15 Oct 2021
- 2021SpeechT5: Unified-Modal Encoder-Decoder Pre-Training for Spoken Language Processing14 Oct 2021
- 2021Decoupling recognition and transcription in Mandarin ASR2 Aug 2021
- 2021BENDR: using transformers and a contrastive self-supervised learning task to learn from massive amounts of EEG data28 Jan 2021