Benchmarking End-to-end Learning of MIMO Physical-Layer Communication
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
End-to-end data-driven machine learning (ML) of multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems has been shown to have the potential of exceeding the performance of engineered MIMO transceivers, without any a priori knowledge of communication-theoretic principles. In this work, we aim to understand to what extent and for which scenarios this claim holds true when comparing with fair benchmarks. We study closed-loop MIMO, open-loop MIMO, and multi-user MIMO and show that the gains of ML-based communication in the former two cases can be to a large extent ascribed to implicitly learned geometric shaping and bit and power allocation, not to learning new spatial encoders. For MU-MIMO, we demonstrate the feasibility of a novel method with centralized learning and decentralized executing, outperforming conventional zero-forcing. For each scenario, we provide explicit descriptions as well as open-source implementations of the selected neural-network architectures.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021SVD-Embedded Deep Autoencoder for MIMO Communicationscited by 5
- 2024Modulation and Coding for NOMA and RSMAcited by 4
- 2021End-to-End Autoencoder Communications with Optimized Interference Suppressioncited by 2
- 2023Deep Autoencoder-based Z-Interference Channels with Perfect and Imperfect CSIcited by 2
- 2024Modulation and Coding for NOMA and RSMA30 Sep 2024
- 2023Deep Autoencoder-based Z-Interference Channels with Perfect and Imperfect CSI23 Oct 2023
- 2021End-to-End Autoencoder Communications with Optimized Interference Suppression29 Dec 2021
- 2021SVD-Embedded Deep Autoencoder for MIMO Communications3 Nov 2021