mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Contextual Embeddings: When Are They Worth It?

arXiv 2005.09117 ↗First posted 18 May 2020cs.CL cs.LGcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the settings for which deep contextual embeddings (e.g., BERT) give large improvements in performance relative to classic pretrained embeddings (e.g., GloVe), and an even simpler baseline---random word embeddings---focusing on the impact of the training set size and the linguistic properties of the task. Surprisingly, we find that both of these simpler baselines can match contextual embeddings on industry-scale data, and often perform within 5 to 10% accuracy (absolute) on benchmark tasks. Furthermore, we identify properties of data for which contextual embeddings give particularly large gains: language containing complex structure, ambiguous word usage, and words unseen in training.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 May 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: