Causal Feature Learning for Utility-Maximizing Agents
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Discovering high-level causal relations from low-level data is an important and challenging problem that comes up frequently in the natural and social sciences. In a series of papers, Chalupka et al. (2015, 2016a, 2016b, 2017) develop a procedure for causal feature learning (CFL) in an effort to automate this task. We argue that CFL does not recommend coarsening in cases where pragmatic considerations rule in favor of it, and recommends coarsening in cases where pragmatic considerations rule against it. We propose a new technique, pragmatic causal feature learning (PCFL), which extends the original CFL algorithm in useful and intuitive ways. We show that PCFL has the same attractive measure-theoretic properties as the original CFL algorithm. We compare the performance of both methods through theoretical analysis and experiments.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2021Local Explanations via Necessity and Sufficiency: Unifying Theory and Practicecited by 45
- 2021Compositional Abstraction Error and a Category of Causal Modelscited by 32
- 2022Discovering Agentscited by 28
- 2025What is causal about causal models and representations?cited by 6
- 2021Matched sample selection with GANs for mitigating attribute confoundingcited by 4
- 2025What is causal about causal models and representations?31 Jan 2025
- 2022Discovering Agents17 Aug 2022
- 2021Compositional Abstraction Error and a Category of Causal Models29 Mar 2021
- 2021Local Explanations via Necessity and Sufficiency: Unifying Theory and Practice27 Mar 2021
- 2021Matched sample selection with GANs for mitigating attribute confounding24 Mar 2021