Sparse Methods for Automatic Relevance Determination
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work considers methods for imposing sparsity in Bayesian regression with applications in nonlinear system identification. We first review automatic relevance determination (ARD) and analytically demonstrate the need to additional regularization or thresholding to achieve sparse models. We then discuss two classes of methods, regularization based and thresholding based, which build on ARD to learn parsimonious solutions to linear problems. In the case of orthogonal covariates, we analytically demonstrate favorable performance with regards to learning a small set of active terms in a linear system with a sparse solution. Several example problems are presented to compare the set of proposed methods in terms of advantages and limitations to ARD in bases with hundreds of elements. The aim of this paper is to analyze and understand the assumptions that lead to several algorithms and to provide theoretical and empirical results so that the reader may gain insight and make more informed choices regarding sparse Bayesian regression.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2021Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modellingcited by 87
- 2022Learning Sparse Nonlinear Dynamics via Mixed-Integer Optimizationcited by 29
- 2021Discovery of interpretable structural model errors by combining Bayesian sparse regression and data assimilation: A chaotic Kuramoto-Sivashinsky test casecited by 6
- 2024A Framework for Strategic Discovery of Credible Neural Network Surrogate Models under Uncertaintycited by 5
- 2023A Sparse Bayesian Learning for Diagnosis of Nonstationary and Spatially Correlated Faults with Application to Multistation Assembly Systemscited by 0
- 2024Automatic dimensionality reduction of Twin-in-the-Loop Observerscited by 0
- 2025Sparse Kalman Identification for Partially Observable Systems via Adaptive Bayesian Learningcited by 0
- 2026Joint Model and Data Sparsification via the Marginal Likelihoodcited by 0
- 2026Joint Model and Data Sparsification via the Marginal Likelihood28 May 2026
- 2025Sparse Kalman Identification for Partially Observable Systems via Adaptive Bayesian Learning22 Nov 2025
- 2024A Framework for Strategic Discovery of Credible Neural Network Surrogate Models under Uncertainty13 Mar 2024
- 2024Automatic dimensionality reduction of Twin-in-the-Loop Observers18 Jan 2024
- 2023A Sparse Bayesian Learning for Diagnosis of Nonstationary and Spatially Correlated Faults with Application to Multistation Assembly Systems20 Oct 2023
- 2022Learning Sparse Nonlinear Dynamics via Mixed-Integer Optimization1 Jun 2022
- 2021Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modelling11 Oct 2021
- 2021Discovery of interpretable structural model errors by combining Bayesian sparse regression and data assimilation: A chaotic Kuramoto-Sivashinsky test case1 Oct 2021