DAMIA: Leveraging Domain Adaptation as a Defense against Membership Inference Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep Learning (DL) techniques allow ones to train models from a dataset to solve tasks. DL has attracted much interest given its fancy performance and potential market value, while security issues are amongst the most colossal concerns. However, the DL models may be prone to the membership inference attack, where an attacker determines whether a given sample is from the training dataset. Efforts have been made to hinder the attack but unfortunately, they may lead to a major overhead or impaired usability. In this paper, we propose and implement DAMIA, leveraging Domain Adaptation (DA) as a defense aginist membership inference attacks. Our observation is that during the training process, DA obfuscates the dataset to be protected using another related dataset, and derives a model that underlyingly extracts the features from both datasets. Seeing that the model is obfuscated, membership inference fails, while the extracted features provide supports for usability. Extensive experiments have been conducted to validates our intuition. The model trained by DAMIA has a negligible footprint to the usability. Our experiment also excludes factors that may hinder the performance of DAMIA, providing a potential guideline to vendors and researchers to benefit from our solution in a timely manner.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.
9 papers.
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model (LLM) Security and Privacy: The Good, the Bad, and the Uglycited by 380
- 2021Accuracy-Privacy Trade-off in Deep Ensemble: A Membership Inference Perspectivecited by 10
- 2023A Survey on Trustworthy Edge Intelligence: From Security and Reliability To Transparency and Sustainabilitycited by 7
- 2024Mitigating Privacy Risk in Membership Inference by Convex-Concave Losscited by 5
- 2024TEESlice: Protecting Sensitive Neural Network Models in Trusted Execution Environments When Attackers have Pre-Trained Modelscited by 3
- 2025Membership Inference Attacks on Tokenizers of Large Language Modelscited by 3
- 2025Do Fairness Interventions Come at the Cost of Privacy: Evaluations for Binary Classifierscited by 2
- 2024Double-Dip: Thwarting Label-Only Membership Inference Attacks with Transfer Learning and Randomizationcited by 1
- 2022LTU Attacker for Membership Inferencecited by 0
- 2025Membership Inference Attacks on Tokenizers of Large Language Models7 Oct 2025
- 2025Do Fairness Interventions Come at the Cost of Privacy: Evaluations for Binary Classifiers8 Mar 2025
- 2024TEESlice: Protecting Sensitive Neural Network Models in Trusted Execution Environments When Attackers have Pre-Trained Models15 Nov 2024
- 2024Mitigating Privacy Risk in Membership Inference by Convex-Concave Loss8 Feb 2024
- 2024Double-Dip: Thwarting Label-Only Membership Inference Attacks with Transfer Learning and Randomization2 Feb 2024
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model (LLM) Security and Privacy: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly4 Dec 2023
- 2023A Survey on Trustworthy Edge Intelligence: From Security and Reliability To Transparency and Sustainability27 Oct 2023
- 2022LTU Attacker for Membership Inference4 Feb 2022
- 2021Accuracy-Privacy Trade-off in Deep Ensemble: A Membership Inference Perspective12 May 2021