Remote State Estimation with Smart Sensors over Markov Fading Channels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider a fundamental remote state estimation problem of discrete-time linear time-invariant (LTI) systems. A smart sensor forwards its local state estimate to a remote estimator over a time-correlated M-state Markov fading channel, where the packet drop probability is time-varying and depends on the current fading channel state. We establish a necessary and sufficient condition for mean-square stability of the remote estimation error covariance as ρ2(A)ρ(DM)<1, where ρ(·) denotes the spectral radius, A is the state transition matrix of the LTI system, D is a diagonal matrix containing the packet drop probabilities in different channel states, and M is the transition probability matrix of the Markov channel states. To derive this result, we propose a novel estimation-cycle based approach, and provide new element-wise bounds of matrix powers. The stability condition is verified by numerical results, and is shown more effective than existing sufficient conditions in the literature. We observe that the stability region in terms of the packet drop probabilities in different channel states can either be convex or concave depending on the transition probability matrix M. Our numerical results suggest that the stability conditions for remote estimation may coincide for setups with a smart sensor and with a conventional one (which sends raw measurements to the remote estimator), though the smart sensor setup achieves a better estimation performance.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
7 papers.
- 2022Structure-Enhanced DRL for Optimal Transmission Schedulingcited by 6
- 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning for Wireless Scheduling in Distributed Networked Controlcited by 4
- 2022Structure-Enhanced Deep Reinforcement Learning for Optimal Transmission Schedulingcited by 1
- 2023Semantic-aware Transmission Scheduling: a Monotonicity-driven Deep Reinforcement Learning Approachcited by 1
- 2024Wireless Human-Machine Collaboration in Industry 5.0cited by 0
- 2024Wireless Resource Allocation with Collaborative Distributed and Centralized DRL under Control Channel Attackscited by 0
- 2025Goal-oriented Transmission Scheduling: Structure-guided DRL with a Unified Dual On-policy and Off-policy Approachcited by 0
- 2025Goal-oriented Transmission Scheduling: Structure-guided DRL with a Unified Dual On-policy and Off-policy Approach21 Jan 2025
- 2024Wireless Resource Allocation with Collaborative Distributed and Centralized DRL under Control Channel Attacks16 Nov 2024
- 2024Wireless Human-Machine Collaboration in Industry 5.018 Oct 2024
- 2023Semantic-aware Transmission Scheduling: a Monotonicity-driven Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach23 May 2023
- 2022Structure-Enhanced DRL for Optimal Transmission Scheduling24 Dec 2022
- 2022Structure-Enhanced Deep Reinforcement Learning for Optimal Transmission Scheduling20 Nov 2022
- 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning for Wireless Scheduling in Distributed Networked Control26 Sep 2021