On the Information Plane of Autoencoders
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The training dynamics of hidden layers in deep learning are poorly understood in theory. Recently, the Information Plane (IP) was proposed to analyze them, which is based on the information-theoretic concept of mutual information (MI). The Information Bottleneck (IB) theory predicts that layers maximize relevant information and compress irrelevant information. Due to the limitations in MI estimation from samples, there is an ongoing debate about the properties of the IP for the supervised learning case. In this work, we derive a theoretical convergence for the IP of autoencoders. The theory predicts that ideal autoencoders with a large bottleneck layer size do not compress input information, whereas a small size causes compression only in the encoder layers. For the experiments, we use a Gram-matrix based MI estimator recently proposed in the literature. We propose a new rule to adjust its parameters that compensates scale and dimensionality effects. Using our proposed rule, we obtain experimental IPs closer to the theory. Our theoretical IP for autoencoders could be used as a benchmark to validate new methods to estimate MI in neural networks. In this way, experimental limitations could be recognized and corrected, helping with the ongoing debate on the supervised learning case.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
10 papers.
- 2021Understanding Neural Networks with Logarithm Determinant Entropy Estimatorcited by 10
- 2022HRel: Filter Pruning based on High Relevance between Activation Maps and Class Labelscited by 7
- 2021Information flows of diverse autoencoderscited by 6
- 2022Adaptation of Autoencoder for Sparsity Reduction From Clinical Notes Representation Learningcited by 4
- 2023Understanding and Leveraging the Learning Phases of Neural Networkscited by 2
- 2024Understanding Variational Autoencoders with Intrinsic Dimension and Information Imbalancecited by 1
- 2025Understanding the role of autoencoders for stiff dynamical systems using information theorycited by 1
- 2022The learning phases in NN: From Fitting the Majority to Fitting a Fewcited by 0
- 2022Mutual Information Learned Regressor: an Information-theoretic Viewpoint of Training Regression Systemscited by 0
- 2023Accelerating Convolutional Neural Network Pruning via Spatial Aura Entropycited by 0
- 2025Understanding the role of autoencoders for stiff dynamical systems using information theory8 Mar 2025
- 2024Understanding Variational Autoencoders with Intrinsic Dimension and Information Imbalance4 Nov 2024
- 2023Understanding and Leveraging the Learning Phases of Neural Networks11 Dec 2023
- 2023Accelerating Convolutional Neural Network Pruning via Spatial Aura Entropy8 Dec 2023
- 2022Mutual Information Learned Regressor: an Information-theoretic Viewpoint of Training Regression Systems23 Nov 2022
- 2022Adaptation of Autoencoder for Sparsity Reduction From Clinical Notes Representation Learning26 Sep 2022
- 2022HRel: Filter Pruning based on High Relevance between Activation Maps and Class Labels22 Feb 2022
- 2022The learning phases in NN: From Fitting the Majority to Fitting a Few16 Feb 2022
- 2021Understanding Neural Networks with Logarithm Determinant Entropy Estimator8 May 2021
- 2021Information flows of diverse autoencoders15 Feb 2021