POSNoise: An Effective Countermeasure Against Topic Biases in Authorship Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Authorship verification (AV) is a fundamental research task in digital text forensics, which addresses the problem of whether two texts were written by the same person. In recent years, a variety of AV methods have been proposed that focus on this problem and can be divided into two categories: The first category refers to such methods that are based on explicitly defined features, where one has full control over which features are considered and what they actually represent. The second category, on the other hand, relates to such AV methods that are based on implicitly defined features, where no control mechanism is involved, so that any character sequence in a text can serve as a potential feature. However, AV methods belonging to the second category bear the risk that the topic of the texts may bias their classification predictions, which in turn may lead to misleading conclusions regarding their results. To tackle this problem, we propose a preprocessing technique called POSNoise, which effectively masks topic-related content in a given text. In this way, AV methods are forced to focus on such text units that are more related to the writing style. Our empirical evaluation based on six AV methods (falling into the second category) and seven corpora shows that POSNoise leads to better results compared to a well-known topic masking approach in 34 out of 42 cases, with an increase in accuracy of up to 10%.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 4.
7 papers.
- 2024Grammar as a Behavioral Biometric: Using Cognitively Motivated Grammar Models for Authorship Verificationcited by 4
- 2023Authorship identification under domain shift: a survey of stylistic measures and learned author representationscited by 1
- 2022TraSE: Towards Tackling Authorial Style from a Cognitive Science Perspectivecited by 0
- 2026Authorship Impersonation via LLM Prompting does not Evade Authorship Verification Methodscited by 0
- 2026Normalisation-Based Likelihood Ratio Estimation for Forensic Authorship Verificationcited by 0
- 2026Authorship Verification of Transcribed German-Language Videoscited by 0
- 2026When Writing Style Drifts: Benchmarking Authorship Verification under Distribution Shifts in Genre, Time and the AI-Eracited by 0
- 2026When Writing Style Drifts: Benchmarking Authorship Verification under Distribution Shifts in Genre, Time and the AI-Era18 Aug 2026
- 2026Authorship Verification of Transcribed German-Language Videos31 Jul 2026
- 2026Normalisation-Based Likelihood Ratio Estimation for Forensic Authorship Verification10 Jul 2026
- 2026Authorship Impersonation via LLM Prompting does not Evade Authorship Verification Methods31 Mar 2026
- 2024Grammar as a Behavioral Biometric: Using Cognitively Motivated Grammar Models for Authorship Verification13 Mar 2024
- 2023Authorship identification under domain shift: a survey of stylistic measures and learned author representations30 Sep 2023
- 2022TraSE: Towards Tackling Authorial Style from a Cognitive Science Perspective21 Jun 2022