The Hierarchy of Hyperlogics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Hyperproperties, which generalize trace properties by relating multiple traces, are widely studied in information-flow security. Recently, a number of logics for hyperproperties have been proposed, and there is a need to understand their decidability and relative expressiveness. The new logics have been obtained from standard logics with two principal extensions: temporal logics, like LTL and CTL^*, have been generalized to hyperproperties by adding variables for traces or paths. First-order and second-order logics, like monadic first-order logic of order and MSO, have been extended with the equal-level predicate. We study the impact of the two extensions across the spectrum of linear-time and branching-time logics, in particular for logics with quantification over propositions. The resulting hierarchy of hyperlogics differs significantly from the classical hierarchy, suggesting that the equal-level predicate adds more expressiveness than trace and path variables. Within the hierarchy of hyperlogics, we identify new boundaries on the decidability of the satisfiability problem. Specifically, we show that while HyperQPTL and HyperCTL^* are both undecidable in general, formulas within their exists^*forall^* fragments are decidable.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023Counterfactuals Modulo Temporal Logicscited by 1
- 2024Hyper Strategy Logiccited by 1
- 2025An Information-Flow Perspective on Explainability Requirements: Specification and Verificationcited by 0
- 2025An Information-Flow Perspective on Explainability Requirements: Specification and Verification1 Sep 2025
- 2024Hyper Strategy Logic20 Mar 2024
- 2023Counterfactuals Modulo Temporal Logics15 Jun 2023