A Self-Training Method for Machine Reading Comprehension with Soft Evidence Extraction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural models have achieved great success on machine reading comprehension (MRC), many of which typically consist of two components: an evidence extractor and an answer predictor. The former seeks the most relevant information from a reference text, while the latter is to locate or generate answers from the extracted evidence. Despite the importance of evidence labels for training the evidence extractor, they are not cheaply accessible, particularly in many non-extractive MRC tasks such as YES/NO question answering and multi-choice MRC. To address this problem, we present a Self-Training method (STM), which supervises the evidence extractor with auto-generated evidence labels in an iterative process. At each iteration, a base MRC model is trained with golden answers and noisy evidence labels. The trained model will predict pseudo evidence labels as extra supervision in the next iteration. We evaluate STM on seven datasets over three MRC tasks. Experimental results demonstrate the improvement on existing MRC models, and we also analyze how and why such a self-training method works in MRC. The source code can be obtained from https://github.com/SparkJiao/Self-Training-MRC
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
9 papers.
- 2021Self-training Improves Pre-training for Few-shot Learning in Task-oriented Dialog Systemscited by 18
- 2021Robustifying Multi-hop QA through Pseudo-Evidentiality Trainingcited by 13
- 2021Self-Training with Differentiable Teachercited by 7
- 2022Understanding and Improving Zero-shot Multi-hop Reasoning in Generative Question Answeringcited by 7
- 2021REPT: Bridging Language Models and Machine Reading Comprehension via Retrieval-Based Pre-trainingcited by 6
- 2021Do Answers to Boolean Questions Need Explanations? Yescited by 5
- 2025ECoRAG: Evidentiality-guided Compression for Long Context RAGcited by 4
- 2023Multi-grained Evidence Inference for Multi-choice Reading Comprehensioncited by 1
- 2022U3E: Unsupervised and Erasure-based Evidence Extraction for Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 0
- 2025ECoRAG: Evidentiality-guided Compression for Long Context RAG5 Jun 2025
- 2023Multi-grained Evidence Inference for Multi-choice Reading Comprehension27 Oct 2023
- 2022Understanding and Improving Zero-shot Multi-hop Reasoning in Generative Question Answering9 Oct 2022
- 2022U3E: Unsupervised and Erasure-based Evidence Extraction for Machine Reading Comprehension6 Oct 2022
- 2021Do Answers to Boolean Questions Need Explanations? Yes14 Dec 2021
- 2021Self-Training with Differentiable Teacher15 Sep 2021
- 2021Self-training Improves Pre-training for Few-shot Learning in Task-oriented Dialog Systems28 Aug 2021
- 2021Robustifying Multi-hop QA through Pseudo-Evidentiality Training7 Jul 2021
- 2021REPT: Bridging Language Models and Machine Reading Comprehension via Retrieval-Based Pre-training10 May 2021