mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Absolutely No Free Lunches!

arXiv 2005.04791 ↗First posted 10 May 2020cs.LO stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper is concerned with learners who aim to learn patterns in infinite binary sequences: shown longer and longer initial segments of a binary sequence, they either attempt to predict whether the next bit will be a 0 or will be a 1 or they issue forecast probabilities for these events. Several variants of this problem are considered. In each case, a no-free-lunch result of the following form is established: the problem of learning is a formidably difficult one, in that no matter what method is pursued, failure is incomparably more common that success; and difficult choices must be faced in choosing a method of learning, since no approach dominates all others in its range of success. In the simplest case, the comparison of the set of situations in which a method fails and the set of situations in which it succeeds is a matter of cardinality (countable vs. uncountable); in other cases, it is a topological matter (meagre vs. co-meagre) or a hybrid computational-topological matter (effectively meagre vs. effectively co-meagre).

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 May 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

4 papers.