Absolutely No Free Lunches!
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper is concerned with learners who aim to learn patterns in infinite binary sequences: shown longer and longer initial segments of a binary sequence, they either attempt to predict whether the next bit will be a 0 or will be a 1 or they issue forecast probabilities for these events. Several variants of this problem are considered. In each case, a no-free-lunch result of the following form is established: the problem of learning is a formidably difficult one, in that no matter what method is pursued, failure is incomparably more common that success; and difficult choices must be faced in choosing a method of learning, since no approach dominates all others in its range of success. In the simplest case, the comparison of the set of situations in which a method fails and the set of situations in which it succeeds is a matter of cardinality (countable vs. uncountable); in other cases, it is a topological matter (meagre vs. co-meagre) or a hybrid computational-topological matter (effectively meagre vs. effectively co-meagre).
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2022The no-free-lunch theorems of supervised learningcited by 16
- 2021A Topological Perspective on Causal Inferencecited by 10
- 2026Solomonoff inductioncited by 2
- 2026Understanding Generalization Requires Universal Inductioncited by 0
- 2026Understanding Generalization Requires Universal Induction28 Sep 2026
- 2026Solomonoff induction17 Mar 2026
- 2022The no-free-lunch theorems of supervised learning9 Feb 2022
- 2021A Topological Perspective on Causal Inference18 Jul 2021