mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Neural Data-to-Text Generation via Jointly Learning the Segmentation and Correspondence

arXiv 2005.01096 ↗First posted 3 May 2020cs.CL cs.LGcited by 25

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The neural attention model has achieved great success in data-to-text generation tasks. Though usually excelling at producing fluent text, it suffers from the problem of information missing, repetition and "hallucination". Due to the black-box nature of the neural attention architecture, avoiding these problems in a systematic way is non-trivial. To address this concern, we propose to explicitly segment target text into fragment units and align them with their data correspondences. The segmentation and correspondence are jointly learned as latent variables without any human annotations. We further impose a soft statistical constraint to regularize the segmental granularity. The resulting architecture maintains the same expressive power as neural attention models, while being able to generate fully interpretable outputs with several times less computational cost. On both E2E and WebNLG benchmarks, we show the proposed model consistently outperforms its neural attention counterparts.

Key facts. Cited by 25 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 May 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 16; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

25 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021A Token-level Reference-free Hallucination Detection Benchmark for Free-form Text Generationcited by 138
  2. 2021Text-to-Table: A New Way of Information Extractioncited by 47
  3. 2021Controlling Hallucinations at Word Level in Data-to-Text Generationcited by 41
  4. 2021Does the Order of Training Samples Matter? Improving Neural Data-to-Text Generation with Curriculum Learningcited by 34
  5. 2021Sequence-to-Sequence Learning with Latent Neural Grammarscited by 30
  6. 2022Faithfulness in Natural Language Generation: A Systematic Survey of Analysis, Evaluation and Optimization Methodscited by 27
  7. 2021Towards Faithfulness in Open Domain Table-to-text Generation from an Entity-centric Viewcited by 24
  8. 2021Neural Data-to-Text Generation with LM-based Text Augmentationcited by 22
  9. 2021Improving Compositional Generalization with Self-Training for Data-to-Text Generationcited by 19
  10. 2022Neural Pipeline for Zero-Shot Data-to-Text Generationcited by 19
  11. 2021Learning Fine-grained Fact-Article Correspondence in Legal Casescited by 15
  12. 2021Jointly Improving Language Understanding and Generation with Quality-Weighted Weak Supervision of Automatic Labelingcited by 11
13 more
  1. 2021Stage-wise Fine-tuning for Graph-to-Text Generationcited by 11
  2. 2021Attention Is Indeed All You Need: Semantically Attention-Guided Decoding for Data-to-Text NLGcited by 11
  3. 2021GenNI: Human-AI Collaboration for Data-Backed Text Generationcited by 11
  4. 2022CAB: Comprehensive Attention Benchmarking on Long Sequence Modelingcited by 10
  5. 2024Assessing "Implicit" Retrieval Robustness of Large Language Modelscited by 9
  6. 2021AGGGEN: Ordering and Aggregating while Generatingcited by 7
  7. 2021LOGEN: Few-shot Logical Knowledge-Conditioned Text Generation with Self-trainingcited by 5
  8. 2024A Systematic Review of Data-to-Text NLGcited by 4
  9. 2024Triples-to-isiXhosa (T2X): Addressing the Challenges of Low-Resource Agglutinative Data-to-Text Generationcited by 3
  10. 2022Learning to Express in Knowledge-Grounded Conversationcited by 2
  11. 2023Automatic Logical Forms improve fidelity in Table-to-Text generationcited by 2
  12. 2021Neural Sequence Segmentation as Determining the Leftmost Segmentscited by 1
  13. 2025Ta-G-T: Subjectivity Capture in Table to Text Generation via RDF Graphscited by 0