mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Probing Contextual Language Models for Common Ground with Visual Representations

arXiv 2005.00619 ↗First posted 1 May 2020cs.CL cs.CVcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The success of large-scale contextual language models has attracted great interest in probing what is encoded in their representations. In this work, we consider a new question: to what extent contextual representations of concrete nouns are aligned with corresponding visual representations? We design a probing model that evaluates how effective are text-only representations in distinguishing between matching and non-matching visual representations. Our findings show that language representations alone provide a strong signal for retrieving image patches from the correct object categories. Moreover, they are effective in retrieving specific instances of image patches; textual context plays an important role in this process. Visually grounded language models slightly outperform text-only language models in instance retrieval, but greatly under-perform humans. We hope our analyses inspire future research in understanding and improving the visual capabilities of language models.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 May 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

9 papers.