Differentially Private Federated Learning with Laplacian Smoothing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning aims to protect data privacy by collaboratively learning a model without sharing private data among users. However, an adversary may still be able to infer the private training data by attacking the released model. Differential privacy provides a statistical protection against such attacks at the price of significantly degrading the accuracy or utility of the trained models. In this paper, we investigate a utility enhancement scheme based on Laplacian smoothing for differentially private federated learning (DP-Fed-LS), where the parameter aggregation with injected Gaussian noise is improved in statistical precision without losing privacy budget. Our key observation is that the aggregated gradients in federated learning often enjoy a type of smoothness, i.e. sparsity in the graph Fourier basis with polynomial decays of Fourier coefficients as frequency grows, which can be exploited by the Laplacian smoothing efficiently. Under a prescribed differential privacy budget, convergence error bounds with tight rates are provided for DP-Fed-LS with uniform subsampling of heterogeneous Non-IID data, revealing possible utility improvement of Laplacian smoothing in effective dimensionality and variance reduction, among others. Experiments over MNIST, SVHN, and Shakespeare datasets show that the proposed method can improve model accuracy with DP-guarantee and membership privacy under both uniform and Poisson subsampling mechanisms.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
8 papers.
- 2022Do Gradient Inversion Attacks Make Federated Learning Unsafe?cited by 44
- 2022Federated Learning with Sparsified Model Perturbation: Improving Accuracy under Client-Level Differential Privacycited by 32
- 2024Trustworthy Federated Learning: Privacy, Security, and Beyondcited by 11
- 2023DIFF2: Differential Private Optimization via Gradient Differences for Nonconvex Distributed Learningcited by 10
- 2025DP-FedPGN: Finding Global Flat Minima for Differentially Private Federated Learning via Penalizing Gradient Normcited by 9
- 2026DP-FedAdamW: An Efficient Optimizer for Differentially Private Federated Large Modelscited by 1
- 2026Adaptive Selection of LoRA Components in Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 1
- 2026Privacy-Preserving Heterogeneous Multi-LLM Federated Inference for Cognitive Diagnosiscited by 0
- 2026Privacy-Preserving Heterogeneous Multi-LLM Federated Inference for Cognitive Diagnosis1 Sep 2026
- 2026Adaptive Selection of LoRA Components in Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning7 May 2026
- 2026DP-FedAdamW: An Efficient Optimizer for Differentially Private Federated Large Models23 Feb 2026
- 2025DP-FedPGN: Finding Global Flat Minima for Differentially Private Federated Learning via Penalizing Gradient Norm31 Oct 2025
- 2024Trustworthy Federated Learning: Privacy, Security, and Beyond3 Nov 2024
- 2023DIFF2: Differential Private Optimization via Gradient Differences for Nonconvex Distributed Learning8 Feb 2023
- 2022Federated Learning with Sparsified Model Perturbation: Improving Accuracy under Client-Level Differential Privacy15 Feb 2022
- 2022Do Gradient Inversion Attacks Make Federated Learning Unsafe?14 Feb 2022