Memristors -- from In-memory computing, Deep Learning Acceleration, Spiking Neural Networks, to the Future of Neuromorphic and Bio-inspired Computing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning, particularly in the form of deep learning, has driven most of the recent fundamental developments in artificial intelligence. Deep learning is based on computational models that are, to a certain extent, bio-inspired, as they rely on networks of connected simple computing units operating in parallel. Deep learning has been successfully applied in areas such as object/pattern recognition, speech and natural language processing, self-driving vehicles, intelligent self-diagnostics tools, autonomous robots, knowledgeable personal assistants, and monitoring. These successes have been mostly supported by three factors: availability of vast amounts of data, continuous growth in computing power, and algorithmic innovations. The approaching demise of Moore's law, and the consequent expected modest improvements in computing power that can be achieved by scaling, raise the question of whether the described progress will be slowed or halted due to hardware limitations. This paper reviews the case for a novel beyond CMOS hardware technology, memristors, as a potential solution for the implementation of power-efficient in-memory computing, deep learning accelerators, and spiking neural networks. Central themes are the reliance on non-von-Neumann computing architectures and the need for developing tailored learning and inference algorithms. To argue that lessons from biology can be useful in providing directions for further progress in artificial intelligence, we briefly discuss an example based reservoir computing. We conclude the review by speculating on the big picture view of future neuromorphic and brain-inspired computing systems.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2021Brain-inspired computing: We need a master plancited by 51
- 2021Bottom-up and top-down approaches for the design of neuromorphic processing systems: Tradeoffs and synergies between natural and artificial intelligencecited by 21
- 2022Bayesian Continual Learning via Spiking Neural Networkscited by 12
- 2021Quantifying the Computational Capability of a Nanomagnetic Reservoir Computing Platform with Emergent Magnetization Dynamicscited by 4
- 2021Memristive Stochastic Computing for Deep Learning Parameter Optimizationcited by 3
- 2024A Survey on Offensive AI Within Cybersecuritycited by 3
- 2025Self-Organising Memristive Networks as Physical Learning Systemscited by 2
- 2022On-device Synaptic Memory Consolidation using Fowler-Nordheim Quantum-tunnelingcited by 1
- 2025Stochastic Quantum Spiking Neural Networks with Quantum Memory and Local Learningcited by 1
- 2026How to Train Your Resistive Network: Generalized Equilibrium Propagation and Analytical Learningcited by 1
- 2026How to Train Your Resistive Network: Generalized Equilibrium Propagation and Analytical Learning3 Feb 2026
- 2025Self-Organising Memristive Networks as Physical Learning Systems31 Aug 2025
- 2025Stochastic Quantum Spiking Neural Networks with Quantum Memory and Local Learning26 Jun 2025
- 2024A Survey on Offensive AI Within Cybersecurity26 Sep 2024
- 2022Bayesian Continual Learning via Spiking Neural Networks29 Aug 2022
- 2022On-device Synaptic Memory Consolidation using Fowler-Nordheim Quantum-tunneling27 Jun 2022
- 2021Quantifying the Computational Capability of a Nanomagnetic Reservoir Computing Platform with Emergent Magnetization Dynamics29 Nov 2021
- 2021Bottom-up and top-down approaches for the design of neuromorphic processing systems: Tradeoffs and synergies between natural and artificial intelligence2 Jun 2021
- 2021Brain-inspired computing: We need a master plan29 Apr 2021
- 2021Memristive Stochastic Computing for Deep Learning Parameter Optimization11 Mar 2021