Emerging Relation Network and Task Embedding for Multi-Task Regression Problems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-task learning (mtl) provides state-of-the-art results in many applications of computer vision and natural language processing. In contrast to single-task learning (stl), mtl allows for leveraging knowledge between related tasks improving prediction results on the main task (in contrast to an auxiliary task) or all tasks. However, there is a limited number of comparative studies on applying mtl architectures for regression and time series problems taking recent advances of mtl into account. An interesting, non-linear problem is the forecast of the expected power generation for renewable power plants. Therefore, this article provides a comparative study of the following recent and important mtl architectures: Hard parameter sharing, cross-stitch network, sluice network (sn). They are compared to a multi-layer perceptron model of similar size in an stl setting. Additionally, we provide a simple, yet effective approach to model task specific information through an embedding layer in an multi-layer perceptron, referred to as task embedding. Further, we introduce a new mtl architecture named emerging relation network (ern), which can be considered as an extension of the sluice network. For a solar power dataset, the task embedding achieves the best mean improvement with 14.9%. The mean improvement of the ern and the sn on the solar dataset is of similar magnitude with 14.7% and 14.8%. On a wind power dataset, only the ern achieves a significant improvement of up to 7.7%. Results suggest that the ern is beneficial when tasks are only loosely related and the prediction problem is more non-linear. Contrary, the proposed task embedding is advantageous when tasks are strongly correlated. Further, the task embedding provides an effective approach with reduced computational effort compared to other mtl architectures.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2022Task Embedding Temporal Convolution Networks for Transfer Learning Problems in Renewable Power Time-Series Forecastcited by 4
- 2022Grape Cold Hardiness Prediction via Multi-Task Learningcited by 4
- 2021Learning Twofold Heterogeneous Multi-Task by Sharing Similar Convolution Kernel Pairscited by 2
- 2022Model Selection, Adaptation, and Combination for Transfer Learning in Wind and Photovoltaic Power Forecastscited by 2
- 2023Multi-Task Learning for Budbreak Predictioncited by 2
- 2022Synthetic Photovoltaic and Wind Power Forecasting Datacited by 1
- 2023Parameterized Neural Networks for Financecited by 0
- 2026Multi-Task Learning for Sparsely-Labeled Time Series: A Case Study on Cold-Hardiness Modelingcited by 0
- 2026Multi-Task Learning for Sparsely-Labeled Time Series: A Case Study on Cold-Hardiness Modeling8 Sep 2026
- 2023Parameterized Neural Networks for Finance18 Apr 2023
- 2023Multi-Task Learning for Budbreak Prediction4 Jan 2023
- 2022Grape Cold Hardiness Prediction via Multi-Task Learning21 Sep 2022
- 2022Task Embedding Temporal Convolution Networks for Transfer Learning Problems in Renewable Power Time-Series Forecast29 Apr 2022
- 2022Model Selection, Adaptation, and Combination for Transfer Learning in Wind and Photovoltaic Power Forecasts28 Apr 2022
- 2022Synthetic Photovoltaic and Wind Power Forecasting Data1 Apr 2022
- 2021Learning Twofold Heterogeneous Multi-Task by Sharing Similar Convolution Kernel Pairs29 Jan 2021