Privacy-Preserving Distributed Optimization via Subspace Perturbation: A General Framework
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As the modern world becomes increasingly digitized and interconnected, distributed signal processing has proven to be effective in processing its large volume of data. However, a main challenge limiting the broad use of distributed signal processing techniques is the issue of privacy in handling sensitive data. To address this privacy issue, we propose a novel yet general subspace perturbation method for privacy-preserving distributed optimization, which allows each node to obtain the desired solution while protecting its private data. In particular, we show that the dual variables introduced in each distributed optimizer will not converge in a certain subspace determined by the graph topology. Additionally, the optimization variable is ensured to converge to the desired solution, because it is orthogonal to this non-convergent subspace. We therefore propose to insert noise in the non-convergent subspace through the dual variable such that the private data are protected, and the accuracy of the desired solution is completely unaffected. Moreover, the proposed method is shown to be secure under two widely-used adversary models: passive and eavesdropping. Furthermore, we consider several distributed optimizers such as ADMM and PDMM to demonstrate the general applicability of the proposed method. Finally, we test the performance through a set of applications. Numerical tests indicate that the proposed method is superior to existing methods in terms of several parameters like estimated accuracy, privacy level, communication cost and convergence rate.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 4.
9 papers.
- 2025Mixture of Experts (MoE): A Big Data Perspectivecited by 17
- 2022Quantization enabled Privacy Protection in Decentralized Stochastic Optimizationcited by 7
- 2024Provable Privacy Advantages of Decentralized Federated Learning via Distributed Optimizationcited by 6
- 2024A survey on secure decentralized optimization and learningcited by 4
- 2025From Centralized to Decentralized Federated Learning: Theoretical Insights, Privacy Preservation, and Robustness Challengescited by 4
- 2022Privacy-Preserving Distributed Expectation Maximization for Gaussian Mixture Model using Subspace Perturbationcited by 2
- 2025LAGO: Few-shot Crosslingual Embedding Inversion Attacks via Language Similarity-Aware Graph Optimizationcited by 1
- 2024AttentionX: Exploiting Consensus Discrepancy In Attention from A Distributed Optimization Perspectivecited by 0
- 2025A Weighted Gradient Tracking Privacy-Preserving Method for Distributed Optimizationcited by 0
- 2025A Weighted Gradient Tracking Privacy-Preserving Method for Distributed Optimization14 Sep 2025
- 2025LAGO: Few-shot Crosslingual Embedding Inversion Attacks via Language Similarity-Aware Graph Optimization21 May 2025
- 2025From Centralized to Decentralized Federated Learning: Theoretical Insights, Privacy Preservation, and Robustness Challenges10 Mar 2025
- 2025Mixture of Experts (MoE): A Big Data Perspective18 Jan 2025
- 2024AttentionX: Exploiting Consensus Discrepancy In Attention from A Distributed Optimization Perspective6 Sep 2024
- 2024A survey on secure decentralized optimization and learning16 Aug 2024
- 2024Provable Privacy Advantages of Decentralized Federated Learning via Distributed Optimization12 Jul 2024
- 2022Privacy-Preserving Distributed Expectation Maximization for Gaussian Mixture Model using Subspace Perturbation16 Sep 2022
- 2022Quantization enabled Privacy Protection in Decentralized Stochastic Optimization7 Aug 2022