Sentiment Analysis of Yelp Reviews: A Comparison of Techniques and Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We use over 350,000 Yelp reviews on 5,000 restaurants to perform an ablation study on text preprocessing techniques. We also compare the effectiveness of several machine learning and deep learning models on predicting user sentiment (negative, neutral, or positive). For machine learning models, we find that using binary bag-of-word representation, adding bi-grams, imposing minimum frequency constraints and normalizing texts have positive effects on model performance. For deep learning models, we find that using pre-trained word embeddings and capping maximum length often boost model performance. Finally, using macro F1 score as our comparison metric, we find simpler models such as Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine to be more effective at predicting sentiments than more complex models such as Gradient Boosting, LSTM and BERT.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.
- 2022Sentiment Analysis: Predicting Yelp Scorescited by 0
- 2022Sentiment Analysis: Predicting Yelp Scores20 Jan 2022