mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Compromise-free Bayesian neural networks

arXiv 2004.12211 ↗First posted 25 Apr 2020stat.ML cs.LG stat.APcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We conduct a thorough analysis of the relationship between the out-of-sample performance and the Bayesian evidence (marginal likelihood) of Bayesian neural networks (BNNs), as well as looking at the performance of ensembles of BNNs, both using the Boston housing dataset. Using the state-of-the-art in nested sampling, we numerically sample the full (non-Gaussian and multimodal) network posterior and obtain numerical estimates of the Bayesian evidence, considering network models with up to 156 trainable parameters. The networks have between zero and four hidden layers, either tanh or ReLU activation functions, and with and without hierarchical priors. The ensembles of BNNs are obtained by determining the posterior distribution over networks, from the posterior samples of individual BNNs re-weighted by the associated Bayesian evidence values. There is good correlation between out-of-sample performance and evidence, as well as a remarkable symmetry between the evidence versus model size and out-of-sample performance versus model size planes. Networks with ReLU activation functions have consistently higher evidences than those with tanh functions, and this is reflected in their out-of-sample performance. Ensembling over architectures acts to further improve performance relative to the individual BNNs.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.