When do Word Embeddings Accurately Reflect Surveys on our Beliefs About People?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Social biases are encoded in word embeddings. This presents a unique opportunity to study society historically and at scale, and a unique danger when embeddings are used in downstream applications. Here, we investigate the extent to which publicly-available word embeddings accurately reflect beliefs about certain kinds of people as measured via traditional survey methods. We find that biases found in word embeddings do, on average, closely mirror survey data across seventeen dimensions of social meaning. However, we also find that biases in embeddings are much more reflective of survey data for some dimensions of meaning (e.g. gender) than others (e.g. race), and that we can be highly confident that embedding-based measures reflect survey data only for the most salient biases.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2023From Pretraining Data to Language Models to Downstream Tasks: Tracking the Trails of Political Biases Leading to Unfair NLP Modelscited by 257
- 2021A Survey of Race, Racism, and Anti-Racism in NLPcited by 74
- 2023Knowledge of cultural moral norms in large language modelscited by 51
- 2022American == White in Multimodal Language-and-Image AIcited by 39
- 2021Theoretical foundations and limits of word embeddings: what types of meaning can they capture?cited by 5
- 2022No Word Embedding Model Is Perfect: Evaluating the Representation Accuracy for Social Bias in the Mediacited by 5
- 2022Speciesist Language and Nonhuman Animal Bias in English Masked Language Modelscited by 2
- 2023Measuring Dimensions of Self-Presentation in Twitter Bios and their Links to Misinformation Sharingcited by 1
- 2024Speciesism in Natural Language Processing Researchcited by 1
- 2025Does Local News Stay Local?: Online Content Shifts in Sinclair-Acquired Stationscited by 1
- 2026How Do We Engage with Other Disciplines? A Framework to Study Meaningful Interdisciplinary Discourse in Scholarly Publicationscited by 0
- 2026How Do We Engage with Other Disciplines? A Framework to Study Meaningful Interdisciplinary Discourse in Scholarly Publications15 Jan 2026
- 2025Does Local News Stay Local?: Online Content Shifts in Sinclair-Acquired Stations8 Oct 2025
- 2024Speciesism in Natural Language Processing Research18 Oct 2024
- 2023Knowledge of cultural moral norms in large language models2 Jun 2023
- 2023Measuring Dimensions of Self-Presentation in Twitter Bios and their Links to Misinformation Sharing16 May 2023
- 2023From Pretraining Data to Language Models to Downstream Tasks: Tracking the Trails of Political Biases Leading to Unfair NLP Models15 May 2023
- 2022No Word Embedding Model Is Perfect: Evaluating the Representation Accuracy for Social Bias in the Media7 Nov 2022
- 2022American == White in Multimodal Language-and-Image AI1 Jul 2022
- 2022Speciesist Language and Nonhuman Animal Bias in English Masked Language Models10 Mar 2022
- 2021Theoretical foundations and limits of word embeddings: what types of meaning can they capture?22 Jul 2021
- 2021A Survey of Race, Racism, and Anti-Racism in NLP21 Jun 2021