mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Learning for One-dimensional Consolidation

arXiv 2004.11689 ↗First posted 20 Apr 2020cs.CE eess.IVcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural networks with physical governing equations as constraints have recently created a new trend in machine learning research. In line with such efforts, a deep learning model for one-dimensional consolidation where the governing equation is applied as a constraint in the neural network is presented here. A review of related research is first presented and discussed. The deep learning model relies on automatic differentiation for applying the governing equation as a constraint. The total loss is measured as a combination of the training loss (based on analytical and model predicted solutions) and the constraint loss (a requirement to satisfy the governing equation). Two classes of problems are considered: forward and inverse problems. The forward problems demonstrate the performance of a physically constrained neural network model in predicting solutions for one-dimensional consolidation problems. Inverse problems show prediction of the coefficient of consolidation. Terzaghi's problem with varying boundary conditions are used as example and the deep learning model shows a remarkable performance in both the forward and inverse problems. While the application demonstrated here is a simple one-dimensional consolidation problem, such a deep learning model integrated with a physical law has huge implications for use in, such as, faster real-time numerical prediction for digital twins, numerical model reproducibility and constitutive model parameter optimization.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 5; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

14 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Physics-informed neural network simulation of multiphase poroelasticity using stress-split sequential trainingcited by 26
  2. 2022Partial Differential Equations Meet Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 25
  3. 2022Constitutive model characterization and discovery using physics-informed deep learningcited by 17
  4. 2022Physics-informed neural network solution of thermo-hydro-mechanical (THM) processes in porous mediacited by 8
  5. 2022Inverse modeling of nonisothermal multiphase poromechanics using physics-informed neural networkscited by 6
  6. 2022A Deep Learning Approach for Predicting Two-dimensional Soil Consolidation Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN)cited by 4
  7. 2026Lagged backward-compatible physics-informed neural networks for unsaturated soil consolidation analysiscited by 2
  8. 2024Physics-informed Deep Learning to Solve Three-dimensional Terzaghi Consolidation Equation: Forward and Inverse Problemscited by 1
  9. 2024Parsimonious Universal Function Approximator for Elastic and Elasto-Plastic Cavity Expansion Problemscited by 1
  10. 2025A Critical Assessment of PINNs and Operator Learning for Geotechnical Engineeringcited by 1
  11. 2024CarbonNet: How Computer Vision Plays a Role in Climate Change? Application: Learning Geomechanics from Subsurface Geometry of CCS to Mitigate Global Warmingcited by 0
  12. 2025Operator Learning for Consolidation: An Architectural Comparison for DeepONet Variantscited by 0
2 more
  1. 2026Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Radial Consolidation of Combined Electroosmotic, Vacuum and Surcharge Preloading Considering Smear Effectscited by 0
  2. 2026Critical evaluation of PINN for FWD inverse analysis and differentiable FEM as an alternativecited by 0