mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Nonconvex regularization for sparse neural networks

arXiv 2004.11515 ↗First posted 24 Apr 2020math.OC cs.LG stat.MLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Convex ℓ1 regularization using an infinite dictionary of neurons has been suggested for constructing neural networks with desired approximation guarantees, but can be affected by an arbitrary amount of over-parametrization. This can lead to a loss of sparsity and result in networks with too many active neurons for the given data, in particular if the number of data samples is large. As a remedy, in this paper, a nonconvex regularization method is investigated in the context of shallow ReLU networks: We prove that in contrast to the convex approach, any resulting (locally optimal) network is finite even in the presence of infinite data (i.e., if the data distribution is known and the limiting case of infinite samples is considered). Moreover, we show that approximation guarantees and existing bounds on the network size for finite data are maintained.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

7 papers.