Leveraging the Fisher randomization test using confidence distributions: inference, combination and fusion learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The flexibility and wide applicability of the Fisher randomization test (FRT) makes it an attractive tool for assessment of causal effects of interventions from modern-day randomized experiments that are increasing in size and complexity. This paper provides a theoretical inferential framework for FRT by establishing its connection with confidence distributions Such a connection leads to development of (i) an unambiguous procedure for inversion of FRTs to generate confidence intervals with guaranteed coverage, (ii) generic and specific methods to combine FRTs from multiple independent experiments with theoretical guarantees and (iii) new insights on the effect of size of the Monte Carlo sample on the results of FRT. Our developments pertain to finite sample settings but have direct extensions to large samples. Simulations and a case example demonstrate the benefit of these new developments.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2023Stable Probability Weighting: Large-Sample and Finite-Sample Estimation and Inference Methods for Heterogeneous Causal Effects of Multivalued Treatments Under Limited Overlapcited by 0
- 2026Fast Rerandomization for Balancing Covariates in Randomized Experiments: A Metropolis-Hastings Frameworkcited by 0
- 2026Fast Rerandomization for Balancing Covariates in Randomized Experiments: A Metropolis-Hastings Framework7 Feb 2026
- 2023Stable Probability Weighting: Large-Sample and Finite-Sample Estimation and Inference Methods for Heterogeneous Causal Effects of Multivalued Treatments Under Limited Overlap13 Jan 2023