Levels of Analysis for Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning is currently involved in some of the most vigorous debates it has ever seen. Such debates often seem to go around in circles, reaching no conclusion or resolution. This is perhaps unsurprising given that researchers in machine learning come to these discussions with very different frames of reference, making it challenging for them to align perspectives and find common ground. As a remedy for this dilemma, we advocate for the adoption of a common conceptual framework which can be used to understand, analyze, and discuss research. We present one such framework which is popular in cognitive science and neuroscience and which we believe has great utility in machine learning as well: Marr's levels of analysis. Through a series of case studies, we demonstrate how the levels facilitate an understanding and dissection of several methods from machine learning. By adopting the levels of analysis in one's own work, we argue that researchers can be better equipped to engage in the debates necessary to drive forward progress in our field.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2021Generalized Shape Metrics on Neural Representationscited by 109
- 2024Universal Neurons in GPT2 Language Modelscited by 100
- 2022Warmth and competence in human-agent cooperationcited by 11
- 2024Position: An Inner Interpretability Framework for AI Inspired by Lessons from Cognitive Neurosciencecited by 11
- 2022The Curse of Low Task Diversity: On the Failure of Transfer Learning to Outperform MAML and Their Empirical Equivalencecited by 10
- 2025Levels of Analysis for Large Language Modelscited by 9
- 2023Is Pre-training Truly Better Than Meta-Learning?cited by 6
- 2024Multilevel Interpretability Of Artificial Neural Networks: Leveraging Framework And Methods From Neurosciencecited by 5
- 2025Demystifying the Mechanisms Behind Emergent Exploration in Goal-conditioned RLcited by 3
- 2021The Curse of Zero Task Diversity: On the Failure of Transfer Learning to Outperform MAML and their Empirical Equivalencecited by 0
- 2026Metacognition Should Be the Scientific Framework for Bounded and Effective Self-Governance in Generative AIcited by 0
- 2026Metacognition Should Be the Scientific Framework for Bounded and Effective Self-Governance in Generative AI13 May 2026
- 2025Demystifying the Mechanisms Behind Emergent Exploration in Goal-conditioned RL15 Oct 2025
- 2025Levels of Analysis for Large Language Models17 Mar 2025
- 2024Multilevel Interpretability Of Artificial Neural Networks: Leveraging Framework And Methods From Neuroscience22 Aug 2024
- 2024Position: An Inner Interpretability Framework for AI Inspired by Lessons from Cognitive Neuroscience3 Jun 2024
- 2024Universal Neurons in GPT2 Language Models22 Jan 2024
- 2023Is Pre-training Truly Better Than Meta-Learning?24 Jun 2023
- 2022The Curse of Low Task Diversity: On the Failure of Transfer Learning to Outperform MAML and Their Empirical Equivalence2 Aug 2022
- 2022Warmth and competence in human-agent cooperation31 Jan 2022
- 2021The Curse of Zero Task Diversity: On the Failure of Transfer Learning to Outperform MAML and their Empirical Equivalence24 Dec 2021
- 2021Generalized Shape Metrics on Neural Representations27 Oct 2021