Overestimation of Syntactic Representationin Neural Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the advent of powerful neural language models over the last few years, research attention has increasingly focused on what aspects of language they represent that make them so successful. Several testing methodologies have been developed to probe models' syntactic representations. One popular method for determining a model's ability to induce syntactic structure trains a model on strings generated according to a template then tests the model's ability to distinguish such strings from superficially similar ones with different syntax. We illustrate a fundamental problem with this approach by reproducing positive results from a recent paper with two non-syntactic baseline language models: an n-gram model and an LSTM model trained on scrambled inputs.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Structural Persistence in Language Models: Priming as a Window into Abstract Language Representationscited by 44
- 2023Why Linguistics Will Thrive in the 21st Century: A Reply to Piantadosi (2023)cited by 9
- 2022Towards Unsupervised Content Disentanglement in Sentence Representations via Syntactic Rolescited by 5
- 2022Exploiting Inductive Bias in Transformers for Unsupervised Disentanglement of Syntax and Semantics with VAEscited by 3
- 2023Why Linguistics Will Thrive in the 21st Century: A Reply to Piantadosi (2023)6 Aug 2023
- 2022Towards Unsupervised Content Disentanglement in Sentence Representations via Syntactic Roles22 Jun 2022
- 2022Exploiting Inductive Bias in Transformers for Unsupervised Disentanglement of Syntax and Semantics with VAEs12 May 2022
- 2021Structural Persistence in Language Models: Priming as a Window into Abstract Language Representations30 Sep 2021