mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Straggler-aware Distributed Learning: Communication Computation Latency Trade-off

arXiv 2004.04948 ↗First posted 10 Apr 2020cs.IT cs.DC cs.LGcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When gradient descent (GD) is scaled to many parallel workers for large scale machine learning problems, its per-iteration computation time is limited by the straggling workers. Straggling workers can be tolerated by assigning redundant computations and coding across data and computations, but in most existing schemes, each non-straggling worker transmits one message per iteration to the parameter server (PS) after completing all its computations. Imposing such a limitation results in two main drawbacks; over-computation due to inaccurate prediction of the straggling behaviour, and under-utilization due to treating workers as straggler/non-straggler and discarding partial computations carried out by stragglers. In this paper, to overcome these drawbacks, we consider multi-message communication (MMC) by allowing multiple computations to be conveyed from each worker per iteration, and design straggler avoidance techniques accordingly. Then, we analyze how the proposed designs can be employed efficiently to seek a balance between the computation and communication latency to minimize the overall latency. Furthermore, through extensive simulations, both model-based and real implementation on Amazon EC2 servers, we identify the advantages and disadvantages of these designs in different settings, and demonstrate that MMC can help improve upon existing straggler avoidance schemes.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 5; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

15 papers.

Sort: