Open Diagrams via Coend Calculus
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Morphisms in a monoidal category are usually interpreted as processes, and graphically depicted as square boxes. In practice, we are faced with the problem of interpreting what non-square boxes ought to represent in terms of the monoidal category and, more importantly, how should they be composed. Examples of this situation include lenses or learners. We propose a description of these non-square boxes, which we call open diagrams, using the monoidal bicategory of profunctors. A graphical coend calculus can then be used to reason about open diagrams and their compositions.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.
3 papers.
- 2021Category Theory in Machine Learningcited by 36
- 2024Towards Compositional Interpretability for XAIcited by 10
- 2024On the Anatomy of Attentioncited by 3
- 2024On the Anatomy of Attention2 Jul 2024
- 2024Towards Compositional Interpretability for XAI25 Jun 2024
- 2021Category Theory in Machine Learning13 Jun 2021