Uncertainty quantification in imaging and automatic horizon tracking: a Bayesian deep-prior based approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In inverse problems, uncertainty quantification (UQ) deals with a probabilistic description of the solution nonuniqueness and data noise sensitivity. Setting seismic imaging into a Bayesian framework allows for a principled way of studying uncertainty by solving for the model posterior distribution. Imaging, however, typically constitutes only the first stage of a sequential workflow, and UQ becomes even more relevant when applied to subsequent tasks that are highly sensitive to the inversion outcome. In this paper, we focus on how UQ trickles down to horizon tracking for the determination of stratigraphic models and investigate its sensitivity with respect to the imaging result. As such, the main contribution of this work consists in a data-guided approach to horizon tracking uncertainty analysis. This work is fundamentally based on a special reparameterization of reflectivity, known as "deep prior". Feasible models are restricted to the output of a convolutional neural network with a fixed input, while weights and biases are Gaussian random variables. Given a deep prior model, the network parameters are sampled from the posterior distribution via a Markov chain Monte Carlo method, from which the conditional mean and point-wise standard deviation of the inferred reflectivities are approximated. For each sample of the posterior distribution, a reflectivity is generated, and the horizons are tracked automatically. In this way, uncertainty on model parameters naturally translates to horizon tracking. As part of the validation for the proposed approach, we verified that the estimated confidence intervals for the horizon tracking coincide with geologically complex regions, such as faults.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2022Reliable amortized variational inference with physics-based latent distribution correctioncited by 25
- 2021Deep Bayesian inference for seismic imaging with taskscited by 12
- 2021Learning by example: fast reliability-aware seismic imaging with normalizing flowscited by 10
- 2023Learned multiphysics inversion with differentiable programming and machine learningcited by 7
- 2022Velocity continuation with Fourier neural operators for accelerated uncertainty quantificationcited by 2
- 2026Dual-space posterior sampling for Bayesian inference in constrained inverse problemscited by 2
- 2022Posterior sampling with CNN-based, Plug-and-Play regularization with applications to Post-Stack Seismic Inversioncited by 0
- 2026Dual-space posterior sampling for Bayesian inference in constrained inverse problems28 Feb 2026
- 2023Learned multiphysics inversion with differentiable programming and machine learning12 Apr 2023
- 2022Posterior sampling with CNN-based, Plug-and-Play regularization with applications to Post-Stack Seismic Inversion30 Dec 2022
- 2022Reliable amortized variational inference with physics-based latent distribution correction24 Jul 2022
- 2022Velocity continuation with Fourier neural operators for accelerated uncertainty quantification27 Mar 2022
- 2021Deep Bayesian inference for seismic imaging with tasks10 Oct 2021
- 2021Learning by example: fast reliability-aware seismic imaging with normalizing flows13 Apr 2021