Machine Learning String Standard Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study machine learning of phenomenologically relevant properties of string compactifications, which arise in the context of heterotic line bundle models. Both supervised and unsupervised learning are considered. We find that, for a fixed compactification manifold, relatively small neural networks are capable of distinguishing consistent line bundle models with the correct gauge group and the correct chiral asymmetry from random models without these properties. The same distinction can also be achieved in the context of unsupervised learning, using an auto-encoder. Learning non-topological properties, specifically the number of Higgs multiplets, turns out to be more difficult, but is possible using sizeable networks and feature-enhanced data sets.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
7 papers.
- 2021Machine-Learning Mathematical Structurescited by 25
- 2021Heterotic String Model Building with Monad Bundles and Reinforcement Learningcited by 10
- 2023The R-mAtrIx Netcited by 4
- 2022Intelligent Explorations of the String Theory Landscapecited by 1
- 2024Neural Network Learning and Quantum Gravitycited by 1
- 2025Hamiltonian Neural Networks approach to fuzzball geodesicscited by 1
- 2025Machine Learning the 6d Supergravity Landscapecited by 0
- 2025Machine Learning the 6d Supergravity Landscape22 May 2025
- 2025Hamiltonian Neural Networks approach to fuzzball geodesics28 Feb 2025
- 2024Neural Network Learning and Quantum Gravity5 Mar 2024
- 2023The R-mAtrIx Net14 Apr 2023
- 2022Intelligent Explorations of the String Theory Landscape17 Apr 2022
- 2021Heterotic String Model Building with Monad Bundles and Reinforcement Learning16 Aug 2021
- 2021Machine-Learning Mathematical Structures15 Jan 2021