From unbiased MDI Feature Importance to Explainable AI for Trees
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We attempt to give a unifying view of the various recent attempts to (i) improve the interpretability of tree-based models and (ii) debias the the default variable-importance measure in random Forests, Gini importance. In particular, we demonstrate a common thread among the out-of-bag based bias correction methods and their connection to local explanation for trees. In addition, we point out a bias caused by the inclusion of inbag data in the newly developed explainable AI for trees algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
3 papers.
- 2022Individualized and Global Feature Attributions for Gradient Boosted Trees in the Presence of ℓ2 Regularizationcited by 2
- 2024A survey and taxonomy of methods interpreting random forest modelscited by 2
- 2021Data-driven advice for interpreting local and global model predictions in bioinformatics problemscited by 0
- 2024A survey and taxonomy of methods interpreting random forest models17 Jul 2024
- 2022Individualized and Global Feature Attributions for Gradient Boosted Trees in the Presence of ℓ2 Regularization8 Nov 2022
- 2021Data-driven advice for interpreting local and global model predictions in bioinformatics problems13 Aug 2021