mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On Calibration of Mixup Training for Deep Neural Networks

arXiv 2003.09946 ↗First posted 22 Mar 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Neural Networks (DNN) represent the state of the art in many tasks. However, due to their overparameterization, their generalization capabilities are in doubt and still a field under study. Consequently, DNN can overfit and assign overconfident predictions -- effects that have been shown to affect the calibration of the confidences assigned to unseen data. Data Augmentation (DA) strategies have been proposed to regularize these models, being Mixup one of the most popular due to its ability to improve the accuracy, the uncertainty quantification and the calibration of DNN. In this work however we argue and provide empirical evidence that, due to its fundamentals, Mixup does not necessarily improve calibration. Based on our observations we propose a new loss function that improves the calibration, and also sometimes the accuracy, of DNN trained with this DA technique. Our loss is inspired by Bayes decision theory and introduces a new training framework for designing losses for probabilistic modelling. We provide state-of-the-art accuracy with consistent improvements in calibration performance. Appendix and code are provided here: https://github.com/jmaronas/calibration_MixupDNN_ARCLoss.pytorch.git

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 3.

5 papers.